The New York Jewish Week: Connecting the World to Jewish, News, Culture, Features, and Opinions for Friday, 7 November 2014
Dear Reader,
The Modern Orthodox community continues to struggle in the aftermath of the news that a leading rabbi allegedly spied on women in the mikvah. As we were at The Jewish Week continue our efforts to gather the news and try to understand its significance, we upset another leading rabbi who compared our publication with the Nazi propaganda machine. Read our editorial here.
A Rabbi’s Low BlowThe leader of Teaneck's biggest Orthodox synagogue compares The Jewish Week to Nazi newspaper Der Sturmer.
The Jewish Week has long encouraged respectful debate and discussion in its pages on religious, political and social issues. And we look to our rabbis to serve as role models in expressing views that educate rather than marginalize.
So we were particularly disheartened when a member of the executive committee of the Rabbinical Council of America (RCA) and spiritual leader of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun, an 800-member synagogue, the largest Orthodox congregation in Teaneck, N.J., took to his blog last week to compare The Jewish Week to an infamous Nazi newspaper.
Rabbi Steven Pruzansky, who has described “Jewish journalism” as an “oxymoron,” was upset that our initial online report last week on his resignation as head of a conversion court erred in identifying it as the Beth Din of America when in fact it was the Beit Din of the Rabbinical Council of Bergen County. (We corrected the mistake later that day.) He was particularly disturbed with a phrase that said he had “shared the company” of Rabbi Barry Freundel on the RCA executive committee. Rabbi Freundel was arrested in Washington, D.C., last month for voyeurism at the mikvah.
We regret the use of the phrase, which was not intended to suggest, as Rabbi Pruzansky inferred, that he was “somehow … connected to the alleged malfeasance in DC.”
(According to their rabbinic colleagues, though, the two men were politically aligned in an unsuccessful challenge to the RCA slate of officers elected in 2012, calling for the group to resist more open approaches to Orthodoxy.)
Here, in part, is what Rabbi Pruzansky wrote about us:
“They should apologize. But, I guess, to follow their way of reporting, both The Jewish Week’s publisher and Julius Streicher (Der Sturmer) published newspapers that dealt a lot with Jews. Same business, I suppose. That’s bad company to be in.”
Der Sturmer, of course, was the central vehicle of the Nazi propaganda machine.
We find the comparison outrageous, particularly coming from a leading community rabbi and RCA executive member. And to date, the lack of a public expression of remorse from the rabbi and the institutions he serves, or is affiliated with, speaks volumes.
editor@Jewishweek.org
Also, see our homepage for additional coverage of the mikvah scandal, including an opinion piece from the RCA explaining that organization's decision to review its conversion standards.
http://www.thejewishweek.com/
| It is a tough time. But bright spots glimmer. Longtime Jewish journalist Andrew Silow-Carroll, the editor of the New Jersey Jewish News, has written a book that tells Jewish history through its jokes. 4,000 Years, 10 Jokes Jewish history is like the waiter who asks the table full of retired ladies, 'Is anything all right?' Steve Lipman Staff Writer Andrew Silow-Carroll, editor-in-chief of the New Jersey Jewish News, is a veteran of the Jewish community’s communications world, with previous stints at The Forward and CLAL. He’s also a maven on Jewish humor. He’ll talk about “The History of the Jews in Ten Jokes” at Temple Emanu-El’s adult education Skirball Center on Nov. 19, Dec. 3 and 10. The Jewish Week interviewed him by email. This is an edited transcript. Q: A Google search of “Jewish history” brings up 111,000,000 results. You can condense it into 10 jokes? A: Nine, if I leave out the one about a rabbi, the priest and the gastroenterologist. In fact I like to think of this as a history course, with jokes as the organizing principle for a discussion of 10 major themes in Jewish history, from the Israelite’s relationship with God to the growing divide between cultural and religious Judaism in the early 21st century. I was inspired by the British Museum series, “A History of the World in 100 Objects.” But coming up with 100 anything is too much like work. Humor experts say there are seven jokes; the rest are variation of the paradigms. Jews have three extra? In Israel they have seven jokes; in the Diaspora we observe the other three — four if it’s a leap year. How has Jewish humor changed over the centuries to reflect the changing times? There are jokes told from a position of power, and jokes told from positions of relative powerlessness. In the Talmud, the sages can be quite cutting in their replies to nonbelievers and skeptics, and since the rabbis wrote the book, and felt in control of their political and religious domain, you can imagine who comes out better in these debates. But skip ahead a millennia or so, and you can see more self-deprecating Jewish humor — whether it is the wedding badchan [Jester] ridiculing the bride and groom, or the Catskills comic roasting his fellow Jews. Does all Jewish humor translate — in other words, is it dependent on a specific location, a specific culture, a specific language? There’s Jewish humor, and there’s Judaism humor. Jewish humor tends to translate, since it trades in stock stereotypes — miserliness, assertive wives, smothering mothers, hypocritical or incompetent clergy — that listeners either share or can plug into their own culture. The Judaism jokes require a certain level of Jewish education or knowledge. There’s a great old joke with the punch line, “your dog is so machmir! [halachically strict]” which kills in the yeshiva, but no so much at Caroline’s. At one time, the overwhelming majority of stand-up comics in the U.S. were Jewish. The percentage is going down now. Are today’s American Jews less funny than earlier ones? Not less funny — less hungry. The Jewish humor explosion of the mid-20th century came at a time of limited opportunities for Jews in so many professions, including on the stage. It’s sort of like Jews and basketball — it used to be our game, until we got into law school. Is all of Jewish history funny? It’s like the waiter who asks the table full of retired Jewish ladies, “Is anything all right?” We don’t have a very happy history. But even in the midst of misery, Jews developed a sense of humor as a coping style. Jews tell jokes about the Inquisition, about the Holocaust, about pogroms — oh wait, that’s just Mel Brooks. Does Jewish humor go back to biblical times? Hershey Friedman wrote a fun, smart paper called “Humor in the Hebrew Bible,” and gives examples of all these different styles found there: “puns, wordplays, riddles, jokes, satires, lampoons, sarcasm, irony, wit, black humor, comedy, slapstick, farce, burlesques, caricatures, parody, and travesty.” The funniest set piece in Chumash is probably that of Balaam’s ass, and not just because 8-year-olds giggle whenever their Hebrew schoolteacher says “ass.” It’s the forerunner of every 19th-century joke about the lowly peddler who turns the tables on a Cossack or a Russian policeman. Was it hard to get a speaking gig for such a shortened version of Jewish history? I speak very quickly. steve@jewishweek.org Shabbat Shalom, everyone. Best, Helen Chernikoff, Web Director |
|
|
|
____________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment