GO FOR THE JUGGLER. When we talk about the tough Bible topics, we tend to attack others who don't agree with us. That's not the only option. Photo byEdward Dalmulder/flickr.
FUNNY HOW FOLKS can read the same sentence in the Bible and come away with opposite ideas about what to make of it.
I got a taste of that last week when someone tripped over a couple of old blog articles I wrote back in 2013 and posted the links in a “discussion” group.
In normal usage today, the word discussion comes from a late Latin term that means “investigate.” But I’ve found that the word usage on the internet fits more as a derivative of the feuding Appalachian terms “diss” and “cuss.”
What started it all was a really odd question I got from a reader.
- My husband (second husband) and I have been married 4 years and recently after a lot of prayer, discovered Jesus’s teachings on remarriage….
- We have seen several pastors. All pretty much disclaim Jesus’ teachings on Luke 16:18, “Whosoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.” …
- We would like to get different views on the subject. It is very hard to discount Jesus’s own words. Whatever way this goes, we will continue to trust him in all this.
She didn’t much like my answer of no, which I explained in the article Remarried, am I committing adultery?
When she gave me some push-back, I answered with a follow-up article, Dumping husband #2: remarriage is adultery?
As it turns out, there are a lot of people who say they agree with the lady…that the Bible requires her to divorce her second husband.
They tried to post comments to my blog. I allowed only a few to do it because only a few were polite.
Here are some excerpts from the discussion thread, along with answers I wanted to give but didn’t:
- “Mr. Miller, you don’t know what we know, you like only repeat what has been taught to you. Have you ever done deep research?”
- “Stephen Miller, you are just like so many highly educated folks.”
- “Why would he [God] tell someone who is in a damnable sin to keep on committing it, to then be sent to an eternity in hell…You are misleading people.”
- “I would encourage you to do a deeper study of covenant and who God is rather than trying to fit your ‘new world philosophies and thoughts’ into forming who God is.”
One soul advised me to read a self-published book by a writer I had never heard of. When I asked for the writer’s credentials, I was reminded – justly – that the disciples of Jesus had no credentials. But I got a bit skeptical when I was told that the writer “has been qualified by the Holy Spirit.”
As a news journalist, I’d need to confirm that with a reliable source. Wikipedia, maybe.
Many people are terrible at explaining why they believe the way they do. And they seem to get frustrated when others don’t agree with them. So they get personal. Not in a good way.
One comment writer explained it this way to me:
- “I have met many broken people who are extremely passionate about this subject for various reasons, including that they may have been abandoned by a spouse they are still waiting for, along with a whole host of other reasons. Not trying to justify the sinful actions of others at all, just trying to empathize and understand where at least some of these individuals may be coming from. May God grant them and us a spirit of love, meekness, and humility so others won’t be turned away from the gospel and it’s saving power and truth.”
But I’m not going with this group in lobbying for remarried divorcees to get another divorce and go back to the first spouse or to fly solo.
I could be wrong.
But I hope I know Jesus better than that.
For more on divorce
- Complete Bible Handbook, “Divorce,” pages 110-112
- Strange and Mysterious Stuff from the Bible, “A virgin and a 50-shekel fine,” page 15; “Divorce your non-Jewish wives,” page 112
- Understanding Jesus, “Divorce among the Jews,” pages 122-123
Read in browser »
Recent Articles:
Leah’s eyeballs
___________________________________
___________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment