Today's Laws & Customs:
• "The Three Weeks"
During the Three Weeks, from 17th of Tamuz to the 9th of Av, we commemorate the conquest of Jerusalem, the destruction of the Holy Temple and the dispersion of the Jewish people.
Weddings and other joyful events are not held during this period; like mourners, we do not cut our hair, and various pleasurable activities are limited or proscribed. (The particular mourning customs vary from community to community, so consult a competent halachic authority for details.)
Citing the verse (Isaiah 1:27) "Zion shall be redeemed with mishpat [Torah] and its returnees with tzedakah," the Rebbe urged that we increase in Torah study (particularly the study of the laws of the Holy Temple) and charity during this period.
Links:
The Three Weeks
Today in Jewish History:
• Passing of Rabbi Avraham Chaim Na’eh ( 1954)
Rabbi Avraham Chaim Na'eh (1890-1954) was born in Hebron to Rabbi Menachem Mendel Na'eh, a Lubavitcher chassid and dean of the Magen Avot, a yeshiva founded by the S'dei Chemed. With the outbreak of World War One, the Turks, who controlled the Land of Israel at the time, expelled anyone who was not a Turkish citizen. Most of the exiled Jews, including Rabbi Avraham Chaim, gathered in Alexandria, Egypt. During his time there, Rabbi Avraham Chaim founded Yeshivat Eretz Yisrael and wrote the halachic work Shenot Chaim, a concise digest of halachah for Sephardic Jews. In 1918, he returned to Palestine to work for the Edah HaChareidit (a prominent Orthodox communal organization), under Rabbi Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld.
Rabbi Na'eh best known for his halachic works Ketzot ha-Shulchan and Shiurei Torah ("measurements of the Torah"), in which he converted archaic halachic measurements into modern terms. Contemporary halachic authorities follow his measurements to this day.
Daily Quote:
Accept the truth from wherever it comes[Maimonides]
Daily Study:
Chitas and Rambam for today:
Chumash: Parshat Pinchas, 3rd Portion (Numbers 26:52-27:5) with Rashi
• Chapter 26
52The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: נבוַיְדַבֵּר יְהֹוָה אֶל משֶׁה לֵּאמֹר:
53You shall apportion the Land among these as an inheritance, in accordance with the number of names. נגלָאֵלֶּה תֵּחָלֵק הָאָרֶץ בְּנַחֲלָה בְּמִסְפַּר שֵׁמוֹת:
You shall apportion the Land among these: And not to those below age twenty, although they reached the age of twenty before the allocation of the Land-for the conquest took seven years, and the allocation took seven [years]-no one other than these six hundred and one thousand took a portion in the Land, and if one of them had six sons, they received only their father’s portion. - [Sifrei Pinchas 2, B.B. 117a] לאלה תחלק הארץ: ולא לפחותים מבן עשרים, אף על פי שבאו לכלל עשרים בטרם חלוק הארץ, שהרי שבע שנים כבשו ושבע חלקו, לא נטלו חלק בארץ אלא אלו שש מאות אלף ואלף, ואם היה לאחד מהם ששה בנים, לא נטלו אלא חלק אביהם לבדו:
54To the large [tribe] you shall give a larger inheritance and to a smaller tribe you shall give a smaller inheritance, each person shall be given an inheritance according to his number. נדלָרַב תַּרְבֶּה נַחֲלָתוֹ וְלַמְעַט תַּמְעִיט נַחֲלָתוֹ אִישׁ לְפִי פְקֻדָיו יֻתַּן נַחֲלָתוֹ:
To the large you shall give a large inheritance: To the tribe with a large population you shall allocate a larger portion. Although the portions were unequal-since the portions were divided according to the size of the tribes-they were decided by lot, and the lot was determined by the Divine Spirit, as it is stated explicitly in [Tractate Bava Bathra [117b]: Eleazar the kohen was clad with the Urim and Thummim, and he said while inspired with the Divine Spirit, “If such-and-such a tribe is drawn, then such-and-such a territory will be allocated to it.” The tribes were inscribed on twelve slips, and the twelve territories on [another] twelve slips. They mixed them in a box and the chieftain [of a tribe] placed his hand inside and drew out two slips. In his hand came a slip bearing the name of his tribe and a slip [inscribed] with the territory designated for it. The lot itself cried out, saying, “I am the lot drawn for such-and-such a territory for such-and-such a tribe” as it says, “according to lot” (verse 56) [lit. by the mouth of the lot] (Mid. Tanchuma Pinchas 6). Since some areas were superior to others, the Land was not divided [solely] according to measurements, but it was assessed; an inferior piece of land sufficient to sow a kor was equivalent to a superior piece sufficient to sow a seah [a thirtieth of a kor]; it all depended on the value [of the soil]. — [Sifrei Pinchas 7] לרב תרבה נחלתו: לשבט שהיה מרובה באוכלוסין נתנו חלק רב, ואף על פי שלא היו החלקים שוים, שהרי הכל לפי רבוי השבט חלקו החלקים, לא עשו אלא ע"י גורל, והגורל היה על פי רוח הקודש, כמו שמפורש בבבא בתרא (קכב א) אלעזר הכהן היה מלובש באורים ותומים, ואומר ברוח הקדש אם שבט פלוני עולה, תחום פלוני עולה עמו. והשבטים היו כתובים בי"ב פתקין, וי"ב גבולים בי"ב פתקין, ובללום בקלפי והנשיא מכניס ידו לתוכה ונוטל שני פתקין, עולה בידו פתק של שם שבטו, ופתק של גבול המפורש לו, והגורל עצמו היה צווח ואומר אני הגורל עליתי לגבול פלוני, לשבט פלוני, שנאמר על פי הגורל, ולא נתחלקה הארץ במדה, לפי שיש גבול משובח מחברו, אלא בשומא, בית כור רע כנגד בית סאה טוב, הכל לפי הדמים:
55Only through lot shall the Land be apportioned; they shall inherit it according to the names of their fathers' tribes. נהאַךְ בְּגוֹרָל יֵחָלֵק אֶת הָאָרֶץ לִשְׁמוֹת מַטוֹת אֲבֹתָם יִנְחָלוּ:
according to the names of their fathers’ tribes: This refers to those who came out of Egypt. Scripture treats this inheritance differently from all other inheritances [mentioned] in the Torah. For in the case of all other inheritances, the living inherit the dead, whereas here, the dead inherit the living. How is this? Two brothers who came out of Egypt who had sons that entered the Land-one had one [son] and the other had three. The one received one portion, and the three received three, as it says, “You shall apportion the Land among these” (verse 53). The inheritance [of these four] reverts to their grandfather [who left Egypt] and they divided everything equally. This is the meaning of what is stated,“they shall inherit it according to the names of their fathers’ tribes.” For after the sons received it, it was divided up according to the fathers who had left Egypt, whereas had they apportioned it originally according to the number who came out of Egypt, these four would not have received four but only two portions. Now, however, they received four portions. — [B.B. 117a] לשמות מטות אבותם: אלו יוצאי מצרים. שינה הכתוב נחלה זו מכל הנחלות שבתורה, שכל הנחלות החיים יורשים את המתים וכאן מתים יורשים את החיים. כיצד, שני אחים מיוצאי מצרים, שהיו להם בנים בבאי הארץ, לזה אחד ולזה שלשה, האחד נטל חלק אחד, והשלשה נטלו שלשה, שנאמר לאלה תחלק הארץ, חזרה נחלתן אצל אבי אביהן וחלקו הכל בשוה. וזהו שנאמר לשמות מטות אבותם ינחלו. שאחר שנטלו הבנים חלקוה לפי האבות שיצאו ממצרים, ואלו מתחלה חלקוה למנין יוצאי מצרים לא היו נוטלין אלו הארבעה, אלא שני חלקים, עכשיו נטלו ארבעה חלקים:
Only through lot: Heb. א-ַבְּגוֹרָל [The word אַ] excludes Joshua and Caleb [from this method of allocation]. And so it says, “They gave Hebron to Caleb as Moses had spoken” (Jud. 1:20), and it further says,“According to the word of the Lord, they gave him the city he had requested” (Josh. 19:50). - [Sifrei Pinchas 6] אך בגורל: יצאו יהושע וכלב, וכן הוא אומר (שופטים א) ויתנו לכלב את חברון כאשר דבר משה, ואומר (יהושע יט) על פי ה' נתנו לו את העיר אשר שאל:
of their fathers’ tribes: Excluding proselytes and [gentile] slaves. — [Sifrei Pinchas 7] מטות אבתם: יצאו גרים ועבדים:
56The inheritance shall be apportioned between the numerous and the few, according to lot. נועַל פִּי הַגּוֹרָל תֵּחָלֵק נַחֲלָתוֹ בֵּין רַב לִמְעָט:
According to lot: Heb. עַל-פִּי הַגּוֹרָל, lit. by the mouth of the lot. The lot spoke out, as I explained above (verse 54). This tells us that it was divided by the Divine Spirit. (This is why it says, “in accordance with the Lord’s word” [Josh. 19:50].) על פי הגורל: הגורל היה מדבר, כמו שפירשתי, מגיד שנתחלקה ברוח הקודש, לכך נאמר על פי ה':
57These were the numbers of the Levites according to their families: the family of the Gershonites from Gershon, the family of the Kohathites from Kohath, the family of the Merarites from Merari. נזוְאֵלֶּה פְקוּדֵי הַלֵּוִי לְמִשְׁפְּחֹתָם לְגֵרְשׁוֹן מִשְׁפַּחַת הַגֵּרְשֻׁנִּי לִקְהָת מִשְׁפַּחַת הַקְּהָתִי לִמְרָרִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמְּרָרִי:
58These were the family of the families of Levi: the family of the Libnites, the family of the Hebronites, the family of the Mahlites, the family of the Mushites, the family of the Korahites. נחאֵלֶּה | מִשְׁפְּחֹת לֵוִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַלִּבְנִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַחֶבְרֹנִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמַּחְלִי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַמּוּשִׁי מִשְׁפַּחַת הַקָּרְחִי וּקְהָת הוֹלִד אֶת עַמְרָם:
These were the families of Levi: Missing here are the family of the Shimeites, the family of the Uzzielites, and part of the family of the Izharites (Exod. 6:17, 18). אלה משפחת לוי: חסר כאן משפחת השמעי והעזיאלי וקצת מן היצהרי:
59The name of Amram's wife was Jochebed the daughter of Levi, whom [her mother] had borne to Levi in Egypt. She bore to Amram, Aaron, Moses, and their sister Miriam. נטוְשֵׁם | אֵשֶׁת עַמְרָם יוֹכֶבֶד בַּת לֵוִי אֲשֶׁר יָלְדָה אֹתָהּ לְלֵוִי בְּמִצְרָיִם וַתֵּלֶד לְעַמְרָם אֶת אַהֲרֹן וְאֶת משֶׁה וְאֵת מִרְיָם אֲחֹתָם:
Whom [her mother] had borne to Levi in Egypt: Her birth took place in Egypt, but not her conception (Sotah 12a, B.B. 120a, 123b). She gave birth to her as they entered the walls, and she completed the number of seventy, for if you count them individually you will find only sixty-nine (see Gen. 46:8-27). - [Gen. Rabbah 94:9 , Num. Rabbah 13:20] אשר ילדה אתה ללוי במצרים: לידתה במצרים ואין הורתה במצרים. כשנכנסו לתוך החומה ילדתה, והיא השלימה מנין שבעים, שהרי בפרטן אי אתה מוצא אלא ששים ותשע:
60Born to Aaron were Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar. סוַיִּוָּלֵד לְאַהֲרֹן אֶת נָדָב וְאֶת אֲבִיהוּא אֶת אֶלְעָזָר וְאֶת אִיתָמָר:
61Nadab and Abihu died when they offered up an unauthorized fire before the Lord. סאוַיָּמָת נָדָב וַאֲבִיהוּא בְּהַקְרִיבָם אֵשׁ זָרָה לִפְנֵי יְהֹוָה:
62And those counted of them were twenty three thousand, every male aged one month and upward, for they were not counted among the children of Israel, since no inheritance was given them among the children of Israel. סבוַיִּהְיוּ פְקֻדֵיהֶם שְׁלשָׁה וְעֶשְׂרִים אֶלֶף כָּל זָכָר מִבֶּן חֹדֶשׁ וָמָעְלָה כִּי | לֹא הָתְפָּקְדוּ בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל כִּי לֹא נִתַּן לָהֶם נַחֲלָה בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל:
they were not counted among the children of Israel: who were counted from the age of twenty and upward. For what reason?… כי לא התפקדו בתוך בני ישראל: להיות נמנין בני עשרים שנה, ומה טעם:
since no inheritance was given them: And those who were counted from the age of twenty were recipients of an inheritance, as it says, “each person shall be given an inheritance” (verse 54). כי לא נתן להם נחלה: והנמנין מבן עשרים שנה היו בני נחלה, שנאמר איש לפי פקודיו יותן נחלתו:
63This was the census of Moses and Eleazar the kohen, who counted the children of Israel in the plains of Moab, by the Jordan at Jericho. סגאֵלֶּה פְּקוּדֵי משֶׁה וְאֶלְעָזָר הַכֹּהֵן אֲשֶׁר פָּקְדוּ אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּעַרְבֹת מוֹאָב עַל יַרְדֵּן יְרֵחוֹ:
64Among these there was no man who had been [included] in the census of Moses and Aaron when they counted the children of Israel in the Sinai desert. סדוּבְאֵלֶּה לֹא הָיָה אִישׁ מִפְּקוּדֵי משֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן הַכֹּהֵן אֲשֶׁר פָּקְדוּ אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמִדְבַּר סִינָי:
Among these there was no man…: But the women were not included in the decree [enacted in the aftermath] of the spies, for they cherished the Land. The men said, “Let us appoint a leader and return to Egypt!” (14:4), whereas the women said,“Give us a portion” (27:4). This is why the passage of Zelophehad’s daughters follows here. — [Mid. Tanchuma Pinchas 7] ובאלה לא היה איש וגו': אבל על הנשים לא נגזרה גזרת המרגלים, לפי שהן היו מחבבות את הארץ. האנשים אומרים (במדבר יד ד) נתנה ראש ונשובה מצרימה, והנשים אומרות (במדבר כז, ד) תנה לנו אחוזה. לכך נסמכה פרשת בנות צלפחד לכאן:
65For the Lord had said to them, "They shall surely die in the desert," and no one was left of them but Caleb the son of Jephunneh and Joshua the son of Nun. סהכִּי אָמַר יְהֹוָה לָהֶם מוֹת יָמֻתוּ בַּמִּדְבָּר וְלֹא נוֹתַר מֵהֶם אִישׁ כִּי אִם כָּלֵב בֶּן יְפֻנֶּה וִיהוֹשֻׁעַ בִּן נוּן:
Chapter 27
1The daughters of Zelophehad the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph, came forward, and his daughters' names were Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah. אוַתִּקְרַבְנָה בְּנוֹת צְלָפְחָד בֶּן חֵפֶר בֶּן גִּלְעָד בֶּן מָכִיר בֶּן מְנַשֶּׁה לְמִשְׁפְּחֹת מְנַשֶּׁה בֶן יוֹסֵף וְאֵלֶּה שְׁמוֹת בְּנֹתָיו מַחְלָה נֹעָה וְחָגְלָה וּמִלְכָּה וְתִרְצָה:
of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph: Why is this said? Has it not already said, “the son of Manasseh”? But to inform you that Joseph cherished the Land, as it says, “and you shall bring up my bones… ” (Exod. 13:19), and his daughters cherished the Land, as it says, “Give us a portion” (verse 4) (Sifrei Pinchas 10), [hence they were of Joseph’s family in spirit], and to teach you that they [who are mentioned in the verse] were all righteous, for anyone whose deeds and whose father’s deeds are not clearly described, but Scripture specifies one of them to trace his genealogy for praise, he is a righteous man the son of a righteous man, but if it traces his genealogy for shame, as for example, “Ishmael the son of Nethaniah the son of Elishama came” (II Kings 25:25), it is known that all those mentioned with him were wicked people. — [Sifrei Pinchas 9] למשפחת מנשה בן יוסף: למה נאמר, והלא כבר נאמר בן מנשה, אלא לומר לך יוסף חבב את הארץ, שנאמר (בראשית נ כה) והעליתם עת עצמותי וגו', ובנותיו חבבו את הארץ, שנאמר (במדבר כז, ד) תנה לנו אחוזה. וללמדך שהיו כולם צדיקים, שכל מי שמעשיו ומעשה אבותיו סתומים ופרט לך הכתוב באחד מהם ליחסו לשבח, הרי זה צדיק בן צדיק. ואם יחסו לגנאי כגון (מלכים ב' כה כה) בא ישמעאל בן נתניה בן אלישמע, בידוע שכל הנזכרים עמו רשעים היו:
Mahlah, Noah…: Later (36:11) it says, “Mahlah, Tirzah… were” [in a different order]. This teaches us that they were all equal-one to the other; therefore, Scripture changes the order. — [Sifrei Pinchas 11] מחלה נעה וגו': ולהלן הוא אומר (במדבר לו יא) ותהיינה מחלה תרצה, מגיד שכולן שקולות זו כזו, לפיכך שנה את סדרן:
2They stood before Moses and before Eleazar the kohen and before the chieftains and the entire congregation at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting, saying, בוַתַּעֲמֹדְנָה לִפְנֵי משֶׁה וְלִפְנֵי אֶלְעָזָר הַכֹּהֵן וְלִפְנֵי הַנְּשִׂיאִם וְכָל הָעֵדָה פֶּתַח אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד לֵאמֹר:
before Moses and before Eleazar: This [statement that they stood before Eleazar] informs us that they stood before them only in the fortieth year, after Aaron’s death. — [Sifrei Pinchas 12] לפני משה ולפני אלעזר: מגיד שלא עמדו לפניהם אלא בשנת הארבעים, אחר שמת אהרן:
before Moses: And afterwards, “before Eleazar”? Is it possible that if Moses did not know [the law] and Eleazar did know? But transpose the verse and expound it [as if it were written, “before Eleazar and before Moses”]. These are the words of R. Yoshiyah. Abba Chanan said in the name of R. Eleazar: They were sitting in the study hall and they stood before all of them. — [Sifrei Pinchas 12, B.B. 119b] לפני משה: ואחר כך לפני אלעזר, אפשר אם משה לא ידע אלעזר יודע, אלא סרס המקרא ודרשהו, דברי רבי יאשיה. אבא חנן משום רבי אלעזר אומר בבית המדרש היו יושבים, ועמדו לפני כולם:
3"Our father died in the desert, but he was not in the assembly that banded together against the Lord in Korah's assembly, but he died for his own sin, and he had no sons. גאָבִינוּ מֵת בַּמִּדְבָּר וְהוּא לֹא הָיָה בְּתוֹךְ הָעֵדָה הַנּוֹעָדִים עַל יְהֹוָה בַּעֲדַת קֹרַח כִּי בְחֶטְאוֹ מֵת וּבָנִים לֹא הָיוּ לוֹ:
but he was not…: Since they were going to say that “he died for his own sin,” they had to say that it was not for the sin of those who grumbled, and [that he was] not in Korah’s company who incited [the people] against the Holy One, blessed is He, but he died for his own sin alone, ad he did not cause others to sin with him (B.B. 18b, Sifrei Pinchas 13). R. Akiva says, He was the wood gatherer [see 15:32], and R. Shimon says: He was among those who ascended [the mountain] defiantly [see 14:44]. — [Shab . 96b] והוא לא היה וגו': לפי שהיו באות לומר בחטאו מת, נזקקו לומר לא בחטא מתלוננים ולא בעדת קרח שהצו על הקב"ה, אלא בחטאו לבדו מת, ולא החטיא את אחרים עמו. ר' עקיבא אומר מקושש עצים היה. ור' שמעון אומר מן המעפילים היה:
4Why should our father's name be eliminated from his family because he had no son? Give us a portion along with our father's brothers. " דלָמָּה יִגָּרַע שֵׁם אָבִינוּ מִתּוֹךְ מִשְׁפַּחְתּוֹ כִּי אֵין לוֹ בֵּן תְּנָה לָּנוּ אֲחֻזָּה בְּתוֹךְ אֲחֵי אָבִינוּ:
Why should our father’s name be eliminated: We are instead of a son, and if females are not considered offspring, let our mother be taken in levirate marriage by her brother-in-law. — [Sifrei Pinchas 13] למה יגרע שם אבינו: אנו במקום בן עומדות, ואם אין הנקבות חשובות זרע, תתיבם אמנו ליבם:
because he had no son: But if he had a son, they would have made no claim at all. This teaches us that they were intelligent women. — [Sifrei Pinchas 15, Sifrei Pinchas 13] כי אין לו בן: הא אם היה לו בן לא היו תובעות כלום. מגיד שחכמניות היו:
5So Moses brought their case before the Lord. הוַיַּקְרֵב משֶׁה אֶת מִשְׁפָּטָן לִפְנֵי יְהֹוָה:
So Moses brought their case: The law eluded him, and here he was punished for crowning himself [with authority] by saying, “and the case that is too difficult for you, bring to me” (Deut. 1:17) (Mid. Tanchuma Pinchas 8). Another interpretation: This passage ought to have been written through Moses, but Zelophehad’s daughters were meritorious, so it was written through them. — [Sanh. 8a] ויקרב משה את משפטן: נתעלמה הלכה ממנו וכאן נפרע על שנטל עטרה לומר (דברים א, יז) והדבר אשר יקשה מכם תקריבון אלי. דבר אחר ראויה היתה פרשה זו להכתב על ידי משה, אלא שזכו בנות צלפחד ונכתבה על ידן:
• Daily Tehillim: Psalms Chapters 97-103
• Chapter 97
1. When the Lord will reveal His kingship, the earth will exult; the multitudes of islands will rejoice.
2. Clouds and dense darkness will surround Him; justice and mercy will be the foundation of His throne.
3. Fire will go before Him and consume His foes all around.
4. His lightnings will illuminate the world; the earth will see and tremble.
5. The mountains will melt like wax before the Lord, before the Master of all the earth.
6. The heavens will declare His justice, and all the nations will behold His glory.
7. All who worship graven images, who take pride in idols, will be ashamed; all idol worshippers will prostrate themselves before Him.
8. Zion will hear and rejoice, the towns of Judah will exult, because of Your judgments, O Lord.
9. For You, Lord, transcend all the earth; You are exceedingly exalted above all the supernal beings.
10. You who love the Lord, hate evil; He watches over the souls of His pious ones, He saves them from the hand of the wicked.
11. Light is sown for the righteous, and joy for the upright in heart.
12. Rejoice in the Lord, you righteous, and extol His holy Name.
Chapter 98
This psalm describes how Israel will praise God for the Redemption.
1. A psalm. Sing to the Lord a new song, for He has performed wonders; His right hand and holy arm have wrought deliverance for Him.
2. The Lord has made known His salvation; He has revealed His justice before the eyes of the nations.
3. He has remembered His kindness and faithfulness to the House of Israel; all, from the farthest corners of the earth, witnessed the deliverance by our God.
4. Raise your voices in jubilation to the Lord, all the earth; burst into joyous song and chanting.
5. Sing to the Lord with a harp, with a harp and the sound of song.
6. With trumpets and the sound of the shofar, jubilate before the King, the Lord.
7. The sea and its fullness will roar in joy, the earth and its inhabitants.
8. The rivers will clap their hands, the mountains will sing together.
9. [They will rejoice] before the Lord, for He has come to judge the earth; He will judge the world with justice, and the nations with righteousness.
Chapter 99
This psalm refers to the wars of Gog and Magog, which will precede the Redemption.
1. When the Lord will reveal His kingship, the nations will tremble; the earth will quake before Him Who is enthroned upon the cherubim,
2. [before] the Lord Who is in Zion, Who is great and exalted above all the peoples.
3. They will extol Your Name which is great, awesome and holy.
4. And [they will praise] the might of the King Who loves justice. You have established uprightness; You have made [the laws of] justice and righteousness in Jacob.
5. Exalt the Lord our God, and bow down at His footstool; He is holy.
6. Moses and Aaron among His priests, and Samuel among those who invoke His Name, would call upon the Lord and He would answer them.
7. He would speak to them from a pillar of cloud; they observed His testimonies and the decrees which He gave them.
8. Lord our God, You have answered them; You were a forgiving God for their sake, yet bringing retribution for their own misdeeds.
9. Exalt the Lord our God, and bow down at His holy mountain, for the Lord our God is holy.
Chapter 100
This psalm inspires the hearts of those who suffer in this world. Let them, nevertheless, serve God with joy, for all is for their good, as in the verse: "He whom God loves does He chastise." The psalm also refers to the thanksgiving sacrifice-the only sacrifice to be offered in the Messianic era.
1. A psalm of thanksgiving. Let all the earth sing in jubilation to the Lord.
2. Serve the Lord with joy; come before Him with exultation.
3. Know that the Lord is God; He has made us and we are His, His people and the sheep of His pasture.
4. Enter His gates with gratitude, His courtyards with praise; give thanks to Him, bless His Name.
5. For the Lord is good; His kindness is everlasting, and His faithfulness is for all generations.
Chapter 101
This psalm speaks of David's secluding himself from others, and of his virtuous conduct even in his own home.
1. By David, a psalm. I will sing of [Your] kindness and justice; to You, O Lord, will I chant praise!
2. I will pay heed to the path of integrity-O when will it come to me? I shall walk with the innocence of my heart [even] within my house.
3. I shall not place an evil thing before my eyes; I despise the doing of wayward deeds, it does not cling to me.
4. A perverse heart shall depart from me; I shall not know evil.
5. He who slanders his fellow in secret, him will I cut down; one with haughty eyes and a lustful heart, him I cannot suffer.
6. My eyes are upon the faithful of the land, that they may dwell with me; he who walks in the path of integrity, he shall minister to me.
7. He that practices deceit shall not dwell within my house; the speaker of lies shall have no place before my eyes.
8. Every morning I will cut down all the wicked of the land, to excise all evildoers from the city of the Lord.
Chapter 102
An awe-inspiring prayer for the exiled, and an appropriate prayer for anyone in distress.
1. A prayer of the poor man when he is faint [with affliction], and pours out his tale of woe before the Lord.
2. O Lord, hear my prayer, let my cry reach You!
3. Hide not Your face from me on the day of my distress; turn Your ear to me; on the day that I call, answer me quickly.
4. For my days have vanished with the smoke; my bones are dried up as a hearth.
5. Smitten like grass and withered is my heart, for I have forgotten to eat my bread.
6. From the voice of my sigh, my bone cleaves to my flesh.
7. I am like the bird of the wilderness; like the owl of the wasteland have I become.
8. In haste I fled; I was like a bird, alone on a roof.
9. All day my enemies disgrace me; those who ridicule me curse using my name.1
10. For I have eaten ashes like bread, and mixed my drink with tears,
11. because of Your anger and Your wrath-for You have raised me up, then cast me down.
12. My days are like the fleeting shadow; I wither away like the grass.
13. But You, Lord, will be enthroned forever, and Your remembrance is for all generations.
14. You will arise and have mercy on Zion, for it is time to be gracious to her; the appointed time has come.
15. For Your servants cherish her stones, and love her dust.
16. Then the nations will fear the Name of the Lord, and all the kings of the earth Your glory,
17. when [they see that] the Lord has built Zion, He has appeared in His glory.
18. He turned to the entreaty of the prayerful, and did not despise their prayer.
19. Let this be written for the last generation, so that the newborn nation will praise the Lord.
20. For He looked down from His holy heights; from heaven, the Lord gazed upon the earth,
21. to hear the cry of the bound, to untie those who are doomed to die,
22. so that the Name of the Lord be declared in Zion, and His praise in Jerusalem,
23. when nations and kingdoms will gather together to serve the Lord.
24. He weakened my strength on the way; He shortened my days.
25. I would say: "My God, do not remove me in the midst of my days! You Whose years endure through all generations.”
26. In the beginning You laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands.
27. They will perish, but You will endure; all of them will wear out like a garment; You will exchange them like a robe, and they will vanish.
28. But You remain the same; Your years will not end.
29. The children of Your servants will abide; their seed shall be established before You.
Chapter 103
David's prayer when he was ill, this psalm is an appropriate prayer on behalf of the sick, especially when offered by the sick person himself while his soul is yet in his body. He can then bless God from his depths, body and soul. Read, and find repose for your soul.
1. By David. Bless the Lord, O my soul; and all my being, His holy Name.
2. My soul, bless the Lord; forget not all His favors:
3. Who forgives all your sins, Who heals all your illnesses;
4. Who redeems your life from the grave, Who crowns you with kindness and mercy;
5. Who satisfies your mouth with goodness; like the eagle, your youth is renewed.
6. The Lord executes righteousness and justice for all the oppressed.
7. He made His ways known to Moses, His deeds to the Children of Israel.
8. The Lord is compassionate and gracious, slow to anger and of great kindness.
9. He will not contend for eternity, nor harbor ill will forever.
10. He has not dealt with us according to our transgressions, nor requited us according to our sins.
11. For as high as heaven is above the earth, so has His kindness been mighty over those who fear Him.
12. As far as the east is from the west, so has He distanced our transgressions from us.
13. As a father has compassion on his children, so has the Lord had compassion on those who fear Him.
14. For He knows our nature; He is mindful that we are but dust.
15. As for man, his days are like grass; like a flower of the field, so he sprouts.
16. When a wind passes over him, he is gone; his place recognizes him no more.
17. But the kindness of the Lord is forever and ever upon those who fear Him, and His righteousness is [secured] for children's children,
18. to those who keep His covenant, and to those who remember His commands to do them.
19. The Lord has established His throne in the heavens, and His kingship has dominion over all.
20. Bless the Lord, you His angels who are mighty in strength, who do His bidding to obey the voice of His speech.
21. Bless the Lord, all His hosts, His servants who do His will.
22. Bless the Lord, all His works, in all the places of His dominion. My soul, bless the Lord!
Tanya: Igeret HaTeshuva , beginning of Chapter 7
• Lessons in Tanya
• Tuesday, Tammuz 20, 5775 · July 7, 2015
Today's Tanya Lesson
Igeret HaTeshuva , beginning of Chapter 7
In the language of the Zohar, the lower level of repentance entails returning the latter hei of the Four-Letter Name of G‑d to its rightful place — returning the Shechinah, which is the source of Jewish souls, from the exile to which it was banished by transgression. For when a man sins, the Divine vitality that flows forth from the Shechinah descends into the chambers ofkelipah and sitra achra, and from there that individual in turn derives nurture at the time of his sins. Repentance redeems the Shechinah from its exile and returns the flow to its proper place.
This was the theme of the previous chapter.
ואולם דרך האמת והישר לבחינת תשובה תתאה ה״א תתאה הנ״ל, הם ב׳ דברים דרך כלל
However, the true and direct path to the lower level of teshuvah, returning the latter hei as noted above, involves two general elements.
These two elements are: (a) awakening G‑d’s supreme compassion for his soul, and (b) the subjugation and nullification of evil. Both are necessary in order to ensure that the lower level of repentance will be true and direct.
The Rebbe notes that although we have previously learned (ch. 1) that the kernel of repentance is a firm and wholehearted resolution not to commit a particular sin again, nevertheless without the two basic elements about to be discussed such repentance will be neither true nor direct.
Truth implies permanence,1 as in the verse,2 “The lip of truth shall be established forever.” Should one fail to take the preparatory steps about to be mentioned here, it is entirely possible that his forsaking sin — described above as repentance — will not be everlasting, hence not truthful.
Furthermore, these steps also make one’s repentance “direct”. For a state of repentance can also be arrived at very indirectly, as in the case of R. Elazar ben Durdaya, who was led to repentance by circumstances which were in themselves evil.3 The direct path to repentance, by contrast, is found by means of the steps that the Alter Rebbe now describes.
האחד הוא לעורר רחמים העליונים, ממקור הרחמים, על נשמתו ונפשו האלקית
The first is to awaken supreme compassion from the Source of mercy for one’s Divine spirit and soul,
There are two distinct states of Divine compassion, indicated by the terms “Merciful Father” and “Father of Mercy”.4 The former term ( אב הרחמן) merely signifies that G‑d possesses the attribute, or middah, of mercy — and since middah means not only “attribute” but also “measure”, it refers to a finite quality of mercy. The latter term ( אב הרחמים) stresses the fact that G‑d is the father, or fountainhead, of all mercy. Arousing His essential quality of mercy “from the Source of mercy” thus means arousing His infinite measure of compassion — supreme compassion.
שנפלה מאיגרא רמה, חיי החיים ברוך הוא
that has fallen from a lofty height (lit., “rooftop”), the Infinite Source of Life,
לבירא עמיקתא
into a deep pit,5
Not merely from a rooftop but from a “lofty rooftop”; not merely into a pit, but into a “deep pit.”
הן היכלות הטומאה והסטרא אחרא
namely, the chambers of defilement and sitra achra.
As explained in the previous chapter, a person’s sins degrade his soul to the chambers of thekelipot and sitra achra. Finding itself in such a sorry state, such a soul is indeed in need of Divine compassion.
ועל מקורה במקור החיים, הוא שם הוי׳ ברוך הוא
[One should arouse Divine compassion] as well for the source [of the soul] in the Source of Life, the Four-Letter Name of G‑d.
Since the soul is rooted in the Tetragrammaton, its degradation — brought about by sin — correspondingly causes the flow of holiness that emanates from the Tetragrammaton to descend into the chambers of the kelipot and sitra achra. Hence not only the soul, but its Source too, is to be pitied.
וכמו שכתוב: וישוב אל הוי׳ וירחמהו
As the verse states:6 “He shall return to G‑d and He will have compassion for him”; i.e., the sinner shall return to G‑d and have compassion for Him.
But how are we to understand the concept of arousing mercy for the Tetragrammaton?
פירוש: לעורר רחמים על השפעת שם הוי׳ ברוך הוא, שנשתלשלה וירדה תוך היכלות הסטרא אחרא הטמאים להחיותם
This means, arousing compassion for the life-giving power issuing from the Four-Letter Name, that has descended by stages into the chambers of the impure sitra achra, to give them vitality.
על ידי מעשה אנוש ותחבולותיו ומחשבותיו הרעים
[This descent was brought about] by the deeds of man, and his evil schemes and thoughts.
Evil thoughts alone suffice to make the vitality descend into the chambers of the kelipotand sitra achra.
וכמו שכתוב: מלך אסור ברהטים, ברהיטי מוחא וכו׳
As the verse says,7 “The king is bound with gutters,” [which is interpreted to mean that “the King is bound] with the gutters of the mind….”8
As explained by the Rebbe, the image is of the various channels and gutters of the mind through which thoughts, like gushing currents, rush fleetingly. Thus, even transient evil thoughts that one harbors ephemerally can bind and shackle the King; they can exile the flow of vitality emanating from the Four-Letter Name of G‑d.
היא בחינת גלות השכינה כנ״ל
And this state, as noted above,9 is the exile of the Shechinah — the Divine Presence, the level of Malchut (“Kingship”) of the World of Atzilut.
וזמן המסוגל לזה הוא בתיקון חצות
The auspicious time for this [arousal of compassion] is Tikkun Chatzot, themidnight lament for the exile of the Divine Presence,
כמו שכתוב בסדור בהערה, עיין שם באריכות
as pointed out in the note to Tikkun Chatzot in the Siddur; see there at length.
וזה שכתוב שם: נפלה עטרת ראשינו, אוי נא לנו כי חטאנו
We thus find [in that prayer], “The crown of our head is fallen; woe to us, for we have sinned”; i.e., sin causes the soul’s Source (“the crown of our head”) to topple into the depths of the kelipot and sitra achra.
ולכן נקרא הקב״ה מלך עלוב בפרקי היכלות, כמו שכתב הרמ״ק ז״ל
Therefore the Holy One, blessed be He, is called the “humiliated King” inPirkei Heichalot,10 as R. Moshe Cordovero wrote,
כי אין לך עלבון גדול מזה
for there is no humiliation deeper than this, than the ignominy of exile within the realm of the kelipot.
ובפרט כאשר יתבונן המשכיל בגדולת אין סוף ברוך הוא, ממלא כל עלמין וסובב כל עלמין
Especially when a thoughtful person meditates on the greatness of the Infinite One, Who permeates all worlds and encompasses all worlds, for G‑d provides vitality to created beings both in a manner which “permeates” each recipient according to its individual capacity, as well as in a manner that transcends and “encompasses” them,
כל אחד ואחד לפי שיעור שכלו והבנתו
each person [meditating upon G‑d’s greatness] according to the range of his intellect and understanding,
יתמרמר על זה מאד מאד
he will be extremely grieved over this.
The richer one’s perception of G‑d’s majesty, the more intense will be his feeling of compassion for his own soul and for its Source, the bound and humiliated King.
והב׳: לבטש ולהכניע הקליפה והסטרא אחרא
The second element [in one’s preparation for a true and direct path to repentance] is to crush and subdue the kelipah and sitra achra,
אשר כל חיותה היא רק בחינת גסות והגבהה
whose entire being is simply grossness and arrogance;
כמו שכתוב: אם תגביה כנשר וגו׳
as the verse states,11 “If you exalt yourself like the eagle….”
והביטוש וההכנעה עד עפר ממש, זוהי מיתתה וביטולה
This crushing and subjugation, absolutely to dust, is its death and nullification.
היינו: על ידי לב נשבר ונדכה, ולהיות נבזה בעיניו נמאס וכו׳
[Evil is crushed] through a broken and contrite heart, a sense of personal unworthiness, repugnance, and so forth.
As explained in Part I, ch. 29, the animal soul — even of a Beinoni, how much more so of a sinner — is the very person himself. When his heart is humbled, his animal soul which derives from kelipah is, of course, humbled as well. Thus, crushing and subduing one’s arrogance crushes the kelipot and sitra achra.
וכמו שכתוב בזהר הקדוש, על פסוק: זבחי אלקים רוח נשברה, לב נשבר ונדכה וגו׳
This is described in the Zohar12 on the verse,13 “Offerings to G‑d (Elokim) are a broken spirit; (i.e., the offering consists of breaking the spirit of the kelipot and sitra achra, and this is achieved through) a heart broken and contrite….”
כי כל קרבן מן הבהמה הוא לשם הוי׳, היא מדת הרחמים
For all animal offerings are dedicated to G‑d (the Tetragrammaton), the attribute of mercy.
This is why all verses which speak of offerings to G‑d, refer to Him with the Tetragrammaton.
אבל לשם אלקים, היא מדת הדין, אין מקריבין קרבן בהמה
To Elokim, however, the Name indicating the attribute of justice, no animal offering is brought.
כי אם
Instead,
I.e., what is considered an offering to Elokim, for the verse does, after all, state “the offerings to Elokim”?
לשבר ולהעביר רוח הטומאה והסטרא אחרא, וזהו רוח נשברה
[the offering is] the shattering and removing of the spirit of defilement and sitra achra. This is the meaning of a “broken spirit.”
והאיך נשברה רוח הסטרא אחרא, כשהלב נשבר ונדכה וכו׳
How is the spirit of the sitra achra broken? When the heart is broken and contrite….14
| FOOTNOTES | |
| 1. | Note of the Rebbe: “As in Part I, end of ch. 13.” |
| 2. | Mishlei 12:19. |
| 3. | Avodah Zarah 17a. |
| 4. | Note of the Rebbe: “Likkutei Torah, Nasso 23a, and references there.” |
| 5. | Note of the Rebbe: “An expression of the Talmud in Chagigah 5b. The word ‘roof’ is omitted in the text of Rashi in the Talmud, but is to be found in the text of Rashi in Ein Yaakov.” |
| 6. | Yeshayahu 55:7. |
| 7. | Note of the Rebbe: “Shir HaShirim 7:6; see Tzemach Tzedek, ad loc. This requires further clarification.” |
| 8. | Note of the Rebbe: “Addenda to Tikkunei Zohar, Tikkun Vav.” |
| 9. | Note of the Rebbe: “Concerning all the above see [Tanya,] Part I, ch. 45, and the notes referring to it by the Tzemach Tzedek on Eichah, p. 22 (in Or HaTorah on Nach, Vol. II, p. 1053), concerning the variations, etc.” |
| 10. | Note of the Rebbe: “Ch. 18.” |
| 11. | Yirmeyahu 49:16; Ovadiah 1:4. |
| 12. | Note of the Rebbe: “Vayikra 5a.” |
| 13. | Tehillim 51:19. |
| 14. | Note of the Rebbe: “This, too, is implied in the Zohar.” |
• Sefer Hamitzvos:
Tuesday, Tammuz 20, 5775 · July 7, 2015
Today's Mitzvah
A daily digest of Maimonides’ classic work "Sefer Hamitzvot"
Positive Commandment 108
The Purifying Waters of the Red Heifer
We are commanded regarding the laws of the Mei Nidah [the waters in which the ashes of the Red Heifer have been mixed]; the conditions under which they purify [one who is ritually impure as a result of contact with a corpse] and the conditions under which they cause ritual impurity [to the one who handles them].
The Purifying Waters of the Red Heifer
Positive Commandment 108
Translated by Berel Bell
The 108th mitzvah is that we are commanded to follow the laws regarding mei niddah:1 that in some cases it will make [something which was previously tameh] tahor, and in other cases make [something which was previously tahor] tameh, as explained in the section dealing with this mitzvah.2
You should be aware that the 13 forms of tumah listed above3 — namely, neveilah, sheratzim, foods, niddah, a woman who has given birth, a leprous person, a leprous garment, a leprous house, zav, zavah, semen, a deadly body, and mei niddah — as well as the purification procedure for each, are all explicitly stated in Scripture. Each mitzvah contains numerous verses, laws and conditions, as written in the Torah portions Vay'hi BaYom HaShemini,4 Ishah Ki Tazriah,5 Zos Tihiyeh,6 and Vayik'chu Eilechah Parah Adumah.7 These four Torah portions contain all the verses which speak of the forms of tumah.
However, the laws governing these forms of tumah in general, and the details regarding each one in particular are all found in Seder Taharos. Some categories are covered in particular tractates, such as tractate Taharos, Machshirim and Uktzin. These three tractates deal solely with, and were written to explain the tumah of foods. Any mention of other forms of tumah is incidental. Tractate Niddah includes the laws of tumas niddah, zavah, and a woman who has given birth. Tractate Kerisus also contains some laws of a woman who has given birth. Tractate Negaim contains the laws of leprous people, garments and houses. Tractate Zavim contains the laws regarding a zav, zavah and semen. Tractate Ohalos contains the laws of tumas meis. Tractate Parah contains the laws of mei niddah — when it conveys tumah and when taharah.
The tumah of neveilah and sheretz, however, are not limited to any particular tractates. Their laws are scattered throughout this Seder [i.e. Taharos], mostly and primarily in Keilim and Taharos. Tractate Ediyos also deals with many questions of this sort.
We have already written a commentary on this entire Sefer, i.e. Taharos,8 that makes it unnecessary to consult any other book for anything related to tumah and taharah.
FOOTNOTES
1.Well water which has the ashes of the red heifer mixed in. See P113.
2.See Hilchos Parah Adumah, Ch. 15. In general, when sprinkled on a person who is tameh, it will make him tahor. If the person was tahor, and the water was not yet used, it will make him tameh.
3.In the order of Sefer HaMitzvos, this mitzvah is the last among the forms of tumah (P96 — P108). In general, the Rambam writes by each mitzvah where in the Mishneh or Gemara it is discussed. Here, the Rambam lists the sources for all 13 mitzvos together.
4.Lev. 11.
5.Ibid., 12-13.
6.Ibid., 14-15.
7.Num. 19.
8.I.e. the Rambam's commentary to the Mishneh.
Megillah vChanukah - Chapter Three
Halacha 1
In [the era of] the Second Temple, the Greek kingdom issued decrees against the Jewish people, [attempting to] nullify their faith and refusing to allow them to observe the Torah and its commandments. They extended their hands against their property and their daughters; they entered the Sanctuary, wrought havoc within, and made the sacraments impure.
The Jews suffered great difficulties from them, for they oppressed them greatly until the God of our ancestors had mercy upon them, delivered them from their hand, and saved them. The sons of the Hasmoneans, the High Priests, overcame [them], slew them, and saved the Jews from their hand.
They appointed a king from the priests, and sovereignty returned to Israel for more than 200 years, until the destruction of the Second Temple.
Commentary Halacha 1
In [the era of] the Second Temple - The Chanukah miracle took place in the year 3596 (165 BCE). The Greek persecutions began several years beforehand.
the Greek kingdom - More particularly, the Seleucid kingdom of Syria, whose ruling hierarchy was of Greek origin.
issued decrees against the Jewish people, [attempting to] nullify their faith - Bereshit Rabbah 2:4 relates that the Greeks would have the Jews "write on the horn of an ox that they have no portion in the God of Israel."
and refusing to allow them to observe the Torah and its commandments. - See Megillat Antiochus, which relates that the Greeks prevented the Jews from observing the Sabbath and performing circumcision.
They extended their hands against their property - In this era, the Greek rulers established gentile cities in Eretz Yisrael and deprived the Jewish population of its livelihood.
and their daughters - Rashi, Shabbat 23a, states that before a Jewish virgin was married, she was required to have relations with a Greek officer.
they entered the Sanctuary, wrought havoc within - See Middot 1:6, 2:3 and Shekalim 6:3, which speak of the Greeks breaking open portions of theSoreg, a divider on the Temple Mount, and destroying portions of the wall around the Temple Courtyard.
and made the sacraments impure. - As we find with regard to the oil for the Menorah, the Greeks did not destroy the oil; they made it impure.
Herein, there is a lesson regarding the nature of the conflict between the Greeks and the Jews. The Greeks were not anxious to stamp out Judaism entirely. They were prepared to accept Judaism as one of the cultures of the Mediterranean area, which they would incorporate into an all-encompassing collection of knowledge and values; i.e., the sacraments of Judaism would remain, but they would become impure, tainted by Greek culture.
The Jews suffered great difficulties from them, for they oppressed them greatly until the God of our ancestors had mercy upon them, delivered them from their hand, and saved them. - By calling attention to the Divine origin of the Jews' victory before mentioning the Hasmoneans, the Rambam emphasizes the miraculous and spiritual nature of the miracle.
The sons of the Hasmoneans, the High Priests, overcame [them], slew them, and saved the Jews from their hand. - The valiant struggle of the Hasmoneans who were able to defeat the most powerful armies of the world with guerilla forces is recounted in many sources.
They appointed a king from the priests, and sovereignty returned to Israel for more than 200 years, until the destruction of the Second Temple. - There is a significance to these statements beyond the laws of Chanukah. There are many Rabbinic authorities who are highly critical of the Hasmoneans for assuming the kingship of the Jewish people. (See the Ramban's commentary on the Torah, Parashat Vayichi.) Although in Hilchot Melachim 1:7-8, the Rambam writes that King David's descendants have an eternal right to the monarchy in Jerusalem, his description here of the Hasmoneans as kings does not have the slightest intimation of criticism; if anything, the contrary is true.
Several laws regarding the nature of kingship are derived from the Hasmonean kings and others, even from the kings of Herod's dynasty, who ruled after them.
Halacha 2
When the Jews overcame their enemies and destroyed them, they entered the Sanctuary; this was on the twenty-fifth of Kislev.1 They could not find any pure oil in the Sanctuary, with the exception of a single cruse. It contained enough oil to burn for merely one day. They lit the arrangement of candles from it for eight days2 until they could crush olives and produce pure oil.3
Halacha 3
Accordingly, the Sages of that generation ordained that these eight days, which begin from the twenty-fifth of Kislev, should be commemorated to be days of happiness and praise [of God]. Candles should be lit in the evening at the entrance to the houses on each and every one of these eight nights to publicize and reveal the miracle.
These days are called Chanukah. It is forbidden to eulogize and fast on them, as on the days of Purim. Lighting the candles on these days is a Rabbinic mitzvah, like the reading of the Megillah.
Commentary Halacha 3
Accordingly, the Sages of that generation - Shabbat 21b states that the celebration of the holiday was ordained in the year following the miracle.
ordained that these eight days, which begin from the twenty-fifth of Kislev, should be commemorated - There are many who question why the holiday is celebrated for eight days, since the miracle was only for seven (for there was enough oil for the Menorah to burn for a single day). The Rambam's words seem to allude to a resolution of this difficulty. The miraculous lighting of the Menorah began on the twenty-fifth of Kislev and continued for eight days.
[Note, however, the Pri Chadash (Orach Chayim 670:1), who explains that, according to the Rambam, the first day of the celebration was instituted in appreciation of the military victories, while the remaining seven came in recognition of the miracle of the Menorah.]
as days of happiness - an acknowledgement of God's miracles in a material context in appreciation of the military victories.
As the Rambam explains in Hilchot Purim, Chapter 2, "happiness" is associated with feasting. In this context, the Yam shel Shlomo, Bava Kama 7:37, explains that according to the Rambam - in contrast to the rulings of the Tur and theShulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 670:2) - the festive meals customarily served on Chanukah can be considered to be feasts associated with a mitzvah.
and praise [of God]. - A spiritual acknowledgement of God in appreciation of the miracle of the Menorah. These two aspects of the celebration of the holiday reflect the different nature of the miracles mentioned in each of the first two halachot (Likkutei Sichot, Vol. 10).
Candles should be lit in the evening at the entrance to the houses on each and every one of these eight nights to publicize and reveal the miracle. - Both factors, the kindling of the Chanukah candles at night - when their light could be seen - and their placement at the entrance to the house - where their light will be projected into the street - emphasize the principle ofpirsumei nisa, publicizing the Chanukah miracle.
These days are called Chanukah. - According to the Rambam, the choice of this name is somewhat problematic: As mentioned above, there are authorities who associated the name with the expression, חנו כה, "they camped on the twenty-fifth." This certainly does not express the Rambam's view. Megillat Ta'anit associates Chanukah with chanukat hamizbe'ach, the rededication of the altar in the Temple, but there is no mention of this event by the Rambam here.
It is forbidden to eulogize and fast on them, as on the days of Purim. - As mentioned in the commentary on Chapter 2, Halachah 13, the prohibition to eulogize and fast applies only on the days of Chanukah themselves, and not on the preceding or succeeding days.
Significantly, unlike Purim, there is no prohibition against work on Chanukah (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 670:1).
Lighting the candles on these days is a Rabbinic mitzvah, like the reading of the Megillah. - This emphasizes the Rambam's perspective that the allusion to the obligation to read the Megillah in the Megillah itself does not change the status of this mitzvah. (See also the commentary on Chapter 1, Halachah 1.)
Halacha 4
Whoever is obligated to read the Megillah is also obligated to kindle the Chanukah lamp.4 On the first night, a person lighting [the lamp] recites three blessings. They are:
Blessed are You, God, our Lord, King of the universe, who has sanctified us with His commandments and has commanded us5 to light the Chanukah lamp."...who wrought miracles for our ancestors...."6"...who has granted us life, sustained us...."7
When a person who did not recite a blessing [on his own Chanukah lamp] sees a lamp,8 he should recite the latter two blessings.9 On subsequent nights, a person who kindles the lamp should recite two blessings and one who sees a lamp should recite one, for the blessing Shehecheyanu is recited only on the first night.10
Halacha 5
On each and every one of these eight days, the entire Hallel11 is recited.12Before [its recitation], one should recite the blessing "...who has sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us to complete the Hallel." This applies whether the recitation is individual or communal.13
Even though the reading of the Hallel is a mitzvah ordained by the Sages, one may recite the blessing [stating] "who sanctified us with His commandments and commanded us," as one recites a blessing for the reading of the Megillah14 and for the erection of an eruv.15 A blessing should be recited for every definite obligation established by our Sages.16
In contrast, if an obligation was established by the Sages because of a doubt - e.g., tithing d'mai,17 - a blessing is not recited.18 [This principle invites a question:] Why is a blessing recited over the second day of a festival; its observance was ordained only because of doubt?19 [This was ordained] lest it be treated with disdain.20
Halacha 6
It is not the recitation of Hallel on Chanukah alone that is a Rabbinic ordinance, but rather, at all times - i.e., on all the days that the complete Hallel is recited, [the obligation to do so] is a Rabbinic ordinance.
There are eighteen days during the year when it is a mitzvah to recite the entireHallel. They are: the eight days of Sukkot, the eight days of Chanukah, the first day of Pesach, and the holiday of Shavuot. Hallel is not recited on Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur, since they are days of repentance, awe, and fear, and are not days of extra celebration. The [Sages] did not ordain the recitation of Hallel on Purim, because the reading of the Megillah [serves the purpose ofHallel].
Commentary Halacha 6
It is not the recitation of Hallel on Chanukah alone that is a Rabbinic ordinance - Since Chanukah is a Rabbinic holiday, one might think that the recitation of Hallel on those days is Rabbinic in origin, while the recitation ofHallel on the festivals has its source in the Torah itself. This is not the case.
but rather, at all times - i.e., on all the days that the complete Hallel is recited, [the obligation to do so] is a Rabbinic ordinance. - The Ra'avad notes that the Sages (see Pesachim 95b, Arachin 10b) consider Isaiah 30:29, "This song shall be to you as the night of the sanctification of the festivals" to be a reference to the recitation of Hallel. Because of this association with a Biblical verse, he considers the obligation to recite Hallel as different in status from other Rabbinic commandments. Indeed, the Halachot Gedolot considers this obligation to be one of the 613 mitzvot. This runs contrary to the position the Rambam mentions in Sefer HaMitzvot (General Principle 1), where he states that even those mitzvot ordained by the prophets are considered to be Rabbinic commandments.
The Maggid Mishneh explains that the verse in Isaiah reflects a command to recite Hallel in appreciation whenever God redeems us from difficulties. (For this reason, it is customary in certain communities to recite Hallel on the anniversary of a miraculous deliverance.) The custom of reciting Hallel on festivals, however, was established afterwards.
There are eighteen days during the year when it is a mitzvah to recite the entire Hallel - in Eretz Yisrael. There are three more days in the diaspora, as mentioned in the following halachah.
They are: the eight days of Sukkot, the eight days of Chanukah, the first day of Pesach - In contrast to the holiday of Sukkot, when a different musafsacrifice is offered each day, on Pesach the same musaf sacrifice is offered every day throughout the holiday. Therefore, the entire Hallel is recited on the first day alone (Arachin 10b).
(Note also Megillah 10b, which states in connection to the splitting of the Red Sea, the major miracle associate with the later days of Pesach, "My creations are drowning in the sea and you desire to say Hallel!")
and the holiday of Shavuot. Hallel is not recited on Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur, since they are days of repentence, awe, and fear, and are not days of extra - Rosh HaShanah is a day of happiness. Thus, Nechemiah 8:10, "Eat sumptuous foods and drink sweet beverages... for the happiness of God is your strength," is interpreted as a reference to Rosh HaShanah. Nevertheless, it is not a day of "extra celebration."
celebration. - Arachin 10b relates:
The ministering angels enquired before the Holy One, blessed be He: "Master of the world: Why do the Jews not recite songs [of praise] before You on Rosh HaShanah and Yom Kippur?"He told them: "Is it proper that the King should sit on the throne of judgment with the book of life and the book of death open before Him and the Jews should recite songs [of praise]?"
See also the Rambam's Commentary on the Mishnah (Rosh HaShanah 4:7).
The [Sages] did not ordain the recitation of Hallel on Purim, because the reading of the Megillah [serves the purpose of Hallel]. - On this basis, theMeiri states that a person who cannot hear the reading of the Megillah should recite Hallel on Purim.
Halacha 7
In places where the festivals are celebrated for two days, Hallel is recited on 21 days: On the nine days of Sukkot, the eight days of Chanukah, the [first] two days of Pesach, and the two days of Shavuot.21
[In contrast,] the recitation of Hallel on Rosh Chodesh is a custom and not a mitzvah.22 It is observed [only] communally. [To emphasize that it is a custom,] passages are skipped when it is read. A blessing should not be recited over [this reading], since a blessing is not recited over a custom.23
A person [praying] alone should not recite [the Hallel] at all [on Rosh Chodesh].24 If, however, he began its recitation, he should complete it, skipping the passages the community would skip as he reads it.
Similarly, on the other days of Pesach, [the Hallel] is read while skipping passages.25
Halacha 8
And how should one skip? One recites from the beginning of the Hallel until the phrase chalamish lema'y'no mayim. One then skips and [begins] reciting A-donai z'charanu y'varech, [continuing] until Halleluyah. One then skips and [begins] reciting Mah ashiv lA-donai, [continuing] until Halleluyah. Afterwards, one skips and [begins] reciting Min hametzar karati Yah, [continuing] until the conclusion of the Hallel.
This is the common custom. Others skip [passages] according to a different pattern.
Commentary Halacha 8
And how should one skip - when reciting Hallel on Rosh Chodesh and the latter days of Pesach?
One recites from the beginning of the Hallel - Psalm 113
until the phrase chalamish lema'y'no mayim. - The conclusion of Psalm 114.
One then skips and [begins] reciting A-donai z'charanu y'varech - Psalm 115:12
[continuing] until Halleluyah. - The conclusion of that psalm.
One then skips and [begins] reciting Mah ashiv lA-donai - Psalm 116:12
[continuing] until Halleluyah. - The conclusion of that psalm.
Afterwards, one skips and [begins] reciting Min hametzar karati Yah -Psalm 118:5.
[continuing] until the conclusion of the Hallel. - i.e., the conclusion of that psalm.
This is the common custom. - The Maggid Mishneh mentions that this is the custom which was followed in his community. Rav Kapach notes that there are some communities in Yemen that still follow this custom.
Others skip [passages] according to a different pattern. - Today, the popular custom in both Sephardic and Ashkenazic communities is to follow the pattern mentioned by Rashi, Ta'anit 28b. This resembles the pattern mentioned by the Rambam with one difference. Only the first two portions that the Rambam suggests skipping are skipped. From that point onward, the Hallel is recited until its conclusion. (See also Eliyahu Rabba 422.)
Halacha 9
It is appropriate to recite Hallel throughout the entire day. A person who readsHallel in improper sequence does not fulfill his obligation. If a person reads and pauses, reads and pauses, even if he pauses for a time long enough to complete the entire [Hallel], he fulfills his obligation.
On the days when the entire Hallel is recited, one may make an interruption between chapters. Within a [single] chapter, however, one may not make an interruption. On the days when Hallel is read while skipping portions, one may make an interruption even within a chapter.
Commentary Halacha 9
It is appropriate to recite Hallel throughout the entire day. - Although Hallelis recited directly after the morning service, it is not an integral part of the prayer service and may be recited at other times. See Megillah 20b, which derives an allusion to this concept from the exegesis of Psalms 118:24: "This is the day which God wrought; let us rejoice and exult in it." Our "rejoicing and exultation," the recitation of Hallel, may be carried out throughout the entire day.
A person who reads Hallel in improper sequence does not fulfill his obligation. - Megillah 17a,b equates the reading of Hallel with the reading of the Megillah in this respect. (See Chapter 2, Halachah 1.)
Note the Mishnah Berurah 422:26, which explains that there are authorities who rule that proper sequence is required only within a particular psalm. The order of the psalms themselves, however, may be altered. This view, however, is not accepted by most authorities, and the prevailing practice is to follow their ruling.
See also Hilchot Kri'at Shema 2:11, where the Rambam states that it is not absolutely necessary to read the different passages of the Shema in order. On the other hand, there the Rambam explains his decision, stating that the passages of the Shema are not found in this order in the Torah. In contrast, the psalms of Hallel are recited in the order they are found in the Bible.
If a person reads and pauses, reads and pauses, even if he pauses for a time long enough to complete the entire [Hallel], he fulfills his obligation. - From Rosh HaShanah 34b, we can conclude that the laws that apply to the reading of the Megillah also apply to the reading of Hallel. (See Chapter 2, Halachah 2.)
As mentioned in the commentary on that halachah, the Ramah (Orach Chayim65:1) rules that should a person be forced to refrain from completing theShema because the place in which he is located contains filth, he does not fulfill his obligation if he waited the amount of time required to recite the Shema in its entirety. The commentaries question if this law applies with regard to the recitation of Hallel as well. (See Mishnah Berurah 422:25.)
On the days when the entire Hallel is recited, - the recitation of the Hallelhas the strength of a Rabbinic commandment. Hence, the laws governing it are more severe.
one may make an interruption between chapters. - Seemingly, the Rambam does not consider the recitation of Hallel analogous to the recitation of theShema (see Hilchot Kri'at Shema 2:15-16) and appears to allow all interruptions (Maggid Mishneh). The Lechem Mishneh, however, is more restrictive and allows interruptions only when there is a need.
In their analysis of Berachot 14a (the source for this halachah), Rabbenu Asher and other commentaries differ and compare the recitation of Hallel to the recitation of the Shema. Thus, one may greet an honored person between the chapters and may respond to a greeting from anyone at that time. TheShulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 488:1) follows this ruling.
Within a [single] chapter, however, one may not make an interruption. -Here, the Shulchan Aruch (loc. cit.), following the principles mentioned above, states that a person may interrupt his recitation to greet his father or his teacher, or to respond to greetings from an honored person.
On the days when Hallel is read while skipping portions - The Eliyahu Rabba explains that the Rambam's ruling depends on his previous decision that a blessing should not be recited on these days. Making an interruption is significant when a blessing is recited. When a blessing is not recited, what does it matter whether one makes an interruption or not?
Although this explanation may be acceptable according to the Rambam's view, according to the Shulchan Aruch's ruling mentioned below, a different rationale must be applied. (See Be'ur Halachah 422.)
one may make an interruption - as above, any type of interruption
even within a chapter. - The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 422:4) differs and states that while the rules for making interruptions are more lenient on these days, one may not make an interruption for a matter that has no importance whatsoever. One may, however, greet a person one must honor and respond to greetings given by anyone.
Halacha 10
On all the days when the complete Hallel is recited,26 a blessing should be recited before Hallel.27 In places where it is customary to recite a blessing afterwards, a blessing should be recited [on these days].28
What blessing is recited?
God our Lord, all Your works will praise You, and the righteous and Your pious ones, who carry out Your will, and Your nation, the House of Israel, will joyously praise Your name. For it is good to praise You, O God, and it is is pleasant to sing to Your name. From the [spiritual] worlds to the [physical] world, You are the Almighty. Blessed are You, God, the King who is extolled and praised, who is glorified, living and enduring. May He reign at all times and for eternity.29
Halacha 11
There are places which follow the custom of repeating30 each verse fromod'cha ki anitani (Psalms 118:21) until the conclusion of the Hallel.31 Each verse is read a second time. In places where this repetition is customary, the verses should be repeated. In places where it it is customary not to repeat, they should not be repeated.32
Halacha 12
This is the custom according to which Hallel was recited in the days of the early Sages:33 After reciting the blessing, an adult34 begins reciting the Hallel and says, Halleluyah. All the people respond Halleluyah.
He then reads, Hallelu avdei A-donai, and all the people respond, Halleluyah.35He then reads, Hallelu et shem A-donai36 and all the people respond,Halleluyah. He then reads, Yehi shem A-donai mevorach me'atah v'ad olam, and all the people respond, Halleluyah.
Similarly, after every bar [of the Hallel, the people respond Halleluyah]. Thus, they respond Halleluyah 123 times throughout the entire Hallel; a sign to remember this: the years of Aaron's life.37
Halacha 13
[It is] also [customary that] when the reader reaches the beginning of each and every chapter, the people repeat the line he recited. What is implied? When he recites the line B'tzeit Yisrael miMitzrayim,38 the people repeat the line B'tzeit Yisrael miMitzrayim.
The reader then recites beit Yaakov me'am lo'ez and all the people respond,Halleluyah. [They continue to respond Halleluyah after each bar] until the reader reads, Ahavti ki yishma A-donai et koli tachanunai,39 to which the people all respond, Ahavti ki yishma A-donai.... Similarly, when the reader reads Hallelu et A-donai kol goyim,40 the people all respond, Hallelu et A-donai kol goyim.
Halacha 14
The reader should read, Anna A-donai hoshi'ah na, and [the people] should repeat Anna A-donai hoshi'ah na, although it is not the beginning of a chapter. He [then] reads Anna A-donai hatzlichah na, and they repeat Anna A-donai hatzlichah na.41 He reads Baruch haba... and they respond Baruch haba....42
If the person reading the Hallel was a minor, a slave, or a woman, [the people] should repeat the entire Hallel after them word by word.43 The above represents the custom followed in the early ages and it is fitting to adhere to it. At present, however, I have seen different customs in all places with regard to the reading of [the Hallel] and the responses of the people, not one of them resembling another.
| FOOTNOTES | |
| 1. |
Significantly, the wording of the Rambam appears to indicate that the victory of the Hasmoneans took place on the twenty-fifth of Kislev. Rabbenu Nissim and other authorities explain that the victory took place on the twenty-fourth, and it was on the twenty-fifth that the Jews rested from the war and entered the Sanctuary. Indeed, an allusion to this is found in the very name Chanukah, חנוכה, which is broken up into two words, חנו כה, "they camped on the twenty-fifth."
|
| 2. |
The commentaries raise the question: Why was the miracle of the cruse of oil necessary? With regard to communal offerings, in which category falls the kindling of the Menorah, we follow the rule that "the requirement for ritual purity is suspended," if it is impossible to bring the offering in purity (Hilchot Bi'at HaMikdash 4:7-17). Thus, if the cruse of pure oil had burned out, the Jews could have used impure oil. Why did God perform a miracle when there was no absolute necessity?
Among the explanations for this is that God saw the dedication of the Jewish people as evidenced by their search for pure oil, and, in a greater sense, by their entire struggle against the Greeks. This commitment which extended beyond the limits of their intellect evoked a miracle from God that transcended the limits of nature.
|
| 3. |
This fact also provokes a question: Why did it take so long to produce pure olive oil? Although there is an obligation to use oil of the finest quality for the Menorah (see Hilchot Issurei HaMizbe'ach 6:1, 7-8-10), when there is no other alternative, inferior oil prepared for the Menorahis also acceptable. Seemingly, it would have been possible to produce oil from olives in the Jerusalem vicinity in less than eight days.
|
| 4. |
I.e., all adult men and women; similarly, there is an obligation upon parents to train their children in the observance of this mitzvah.
Although Chanukah is a mitzvah that is dependent on a specific time, women are obligated, because "they were also included in the miracle." As mentioned in Halachah 1, the Greeks' decrees affected them and they also had a share in the military victory, for the Greek commander was slain by a woman, Yehudit.
|
| 5. |
Although the mitzvah of kindling Chanukah lights was ordained by the Sages, it is proper to praise God "who commanded us," as explained in Chapter 1, Halachot 1 and 3.
|
| 6. |
This blessing is also recited in commemoration of the Purim miracles (Chapter 1, Halachah 3).
|
| 7. |
This blessing is recited whenever one fulfills a mitzvah that is performed only from time to time (Hilchot Berachot 11:9).
|
| 8. |
The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 676:3) interprets this as referring to a person who has not lit the Chanukah candles yet, is not intending to light them, and will not have them lit by others in his home. (See Chapter 4, Halachah 11.) Since he will not be fulfilling the mitzvah by himself, he should commemorate the miracle by reciting these blessings on candles lit by others.
Significantly, Rav Kapach's version of the Mishneh Torah does not contain the phrase, "who did not recite a blessing." Based on a responsum of the Rambam, he develops a unique interpretation, explaining that one may recite these blessings several times each night if he did not have the intent to light or see additional Chanukah lamps.
|
| 9. |
Since he did not kindle the lamp himself, it is improper for him to praise God for the opportunity to fulfill the mitzvah.
|
| 10. |
After the fulfillment of this mitzvah on the first night, it is no longer appropriate to recite this blessing.
|
| 11. |
Hallel is a selection of celebrant psalms (Psalm 113-118). The Rambam mentions the entire Hallelas a contrast to the partial Hallel recited on Rosh Chodesh and the latter days of Pesach, which is described in Halachah 7.
|
| 12. |
Significantly, the Rambam describes the laws of Hallel in these halachot instead of in the laws of prayer. This emphasizes that Hallel is an expression of praise for the miracles associated with the holiday, and, as apparent from the following halachah, an expression of holiday joy rather than a requirement of prayer.
|
| 13. |
With regard to the partial Hallel, there are differences between an individual recitation and a communal recitation, as explained in Halachah 7. No such differences apply with regard to the fullHallel, and there is an obligation incumbent on each individual to recite these psalms with a blessing.
|
| 14. |
As mentioned in the commentary on the previous halachah, the difficulty is that the blessing implies that the mitzvah was given to us by God, and yet these mitzvot were ordained by the Sages. This difficulty is resolved by explaining that the Torah commands us to adhere to the rulings of the Sages. Therefore, by observing the Sages' command, we are fulfilling God's will. (See Chapter 1, Halachot 1 and 3.)
|
| 15. |
The term eruv refers to three different practices: the convention established to allow one to carry in a closed courtyard on the Sabbath, the convention established to allow one to cook for the Sabbath on a festival that falls on Friday, and the convention allowing one to extend the limits one is allowed to walk on the Sabbath. (See Hilchot Eruvin.)
One might ask why the Rambam mentions the reading of the Megillah and the eruv, but not the kindling of the Chanukah lights mentioned in the previous halachah. Similarly, one may ask why this issue was not discussed with regard to the recitation of the blessing over the Chanukah lights.
|
| 16. |
In addition to these four mitzvot, the mitzvot instituted by the Rabbis over which blessings are recited include the washing of hands before prayer and meals, and the lighting of candles before Sabbaths and festivals.
|
| 17. |
D'mai refers to produce belonging to unlearned individuals whom the Sages suspected of refraining from separating the tithes required by our Sages. They required that the tithes be separated by anyone who acquired such produce. (See Hilchot Ma'aser, Chapter 9.)
|
| 18. |
The Rambam's statement is based on his interpretation of Shabbat 23a. The Ra'avad offers a different interpretation of the passage, which would require the recitation of a blessing for a Rabbinic mitzvah even if it was ordained only because of a doubt. Nevertheless, the Rambam's view is accepted by most authorities.
|
| 19. |
See Hilchot Kiddush HaChodesh, Chapter 5. Originally, when the calendar was determined according to the testimony of witnesses who saw the new moon, the inhabitants of the far-removed areas were in doubt regarding when the festivals should be observed. Hence, they began to observe two days. This practice was perpetuated even in the present age, despite the fact that we follow a fixed calendar.
|
| 20. |
The Sages felt that were the blessing not to be recited, the people would not regard these days as festivals.
|
| 21. |
In order to emphasize that there is no difference between the first day of each holiday and the second, Hallel is recited on both days.
|
| 22. |
Arachin 10b relates that although Rosh Chodesh is called mo'ed (a festival), since there is no prohibition against performing work, there is no obligation to recite Hallel.
The recitation of Hallel on Rosh Chodesh is also dealt with in Ta'anit 28b. That passage relates:
Rav studied in Eretz Yisrael at the time of the composition of the Mishnah and returned to Babylon shortly thereafter. We can thus conclude from this passage that at that time, it was not customary in Eretz Yisrael to read Hallel on Rosh Chodesh, and that it was not until the center of Rabbinic authority shifted to Babylon that this custom became uniformly accepted throughout the Jewish people.
|
| 23. |
The Rambam is reiterating a principle he stated in Hilchot Berachot 11:16, based on Sukkah 44b, which states that a blessing is not recited over the striking of the willows on Hoshana Rabbah, because it is a custom.
Some authorities object, however, explaining that the custom of striking the willows differs from the recitation of the Hallel. In the latter instance, since the Hallel is a lengthy prayer - in contrast to the performance of a simple action - it is proper to recite a blessing (Tosafot, Ta'anit 28b). Others differentiate between the communal recitation (see the following note) of the Hallel, where a blessing is required, and the recitation of these psalms by an individual, when it is not (Rabbenu Yonah, Maggid Mishneh).
The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 422:2) quotes Rabbenu Yonah's view and that of the Rambam, stating that it is customary in Eretz Yisrael to follow the Rambam's ruling. In his gloss, the Ramah quotes Tosafot's view, stating that this is the Ashkenazic custom.
|
| 24. |
Ta'anit 28b states:
The halachic authorities differ in their interpretation of this passage: The Rambam interprets "does not" as "should not" - i.e., these prayers should be recited only communally and not by an individual. The Ashkenazim (Rashi and Tosafot) interpret "does not" as "need not" - i.e., the custom is an obligation on the community, which may be accepted by an individual if he desires.
In this instance, the Shulchan Aruch (loc. cit.) does not accept the Rambam's ruling, and states that a person praying alone should recite the Hallel.
|
| 25. |
Although most halachic authorities equate the latter days of Pesach with Rosh Chodesh totally, the Ramban differs and explains that there is a binding obligation on every individual to recite Hallelthroughout the Pesach holiday. Nevertheless, he agrees that passages should be skipped in its recitation.
|
| 26. |
There is a difference of opinion regarding the conclusion of this blessing. Many authorities state that on the days when the entire Hallel is recited, the blessing should conclude ligmor et haHallel, "to conclude the Hallel." It is, however, Ashkenazic custom to conclude the blessing likro et haHallel at all times, even when the entire Hallel is recited (Ramah, Orach Chayim 488:1).
|
| 27. |
The Rambam's statement emphasizes the contrast between these days when a blessing is recited and the days when the Hallel is recited with skipped passages. On those days, no blessing is recited according to the Rambam, as stated in Halachah 7.
|
| 28. |
The Rambam mentions that the matter is dependent on custom, quoting Sukkah 3:11. In the present day, however, it is a universally accepted custom to recite this blessing.
|
| 29. |
There are slight differences between the text of the blessing quoted by the Rambam and that recited in Ashkenazic communities today. Rav Kapach also mentions slight differences between the authoritative Yemenite manuscripts of the Mishneh Torah and the popularly printed text.
|
| 30. |
According to our present custom, this means that both the chazan and the congregation recite these verses twice. Rav Kapach interprets this as meaning that the verses are repeated by the congregation after the reader.
|
| 31. |
Rashi (Sukkah 38a) explains the rationale for the custom of repeating these verses as follows: The previous verses are repetitive in nature - e.g., "It is better to rely on God than to trust in men; It is better to rely on God than to trust in nobles"; or "The right hand of God performs deeds of valor, the right hand of God is exalted." In contrast, each of the verses from od'cha onward is an independent concept that is not repeated.
|
| 32. |
In the era of the Shulchan Aruch, it appears that there were still variant customs in different communities. (See Orach Chayim 422:3.) Our present custom is to repeat these verses.
|
| 33. |
The Rambam's rulings in this and the following halachot are based on Sukkah 38b, 39a.
|
| 34. |
In contrast to a minor, as mentioned in Halachah 14.
|
| 35. |
With regard to the practice of the people responding Halleluyah after each bar, Rashi (Sukkah38b) cites Sotah 30b's description of the manner in which the Jews responded to Moses' recitation of the song of celebration after crossing the Red Sea.
|
| 36. |
I.e., each verse of the Hallel contains at least two bars. The reader reads each bar out loud, and the people respond after him Halleluyah. The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 422:3) mentions that there are communities that follow these practices. In the present age, these customs are no longer followed in all Ashkenazic and most Sephardic communities.
|
| 37. |
See the Jerusalem Talmud, Shabbat 16:1 and Soferim, Chapter 16.
|
| 38. |
This is the beginning of Psalm 114. The custom mentioned in this halachah is not followed in most communities at present.
|
| 39. |
This is the beginning of Psalm 115. Significantly, the Rambam does not mention Lo lanu, the beginning of Psalm 116 according to our present reckoning.
Rav Kapach explains the Rambam's ruling based on the Jerusalem Talmud (Shabbat 16:1) which states that there are 147 chapters in the book of Psalms. According to the custom he cites, our Psalms 115 and 116 are a single chapter. There are, however, commentaries that maintain that the omission of Lo lanu is merely a printing error.
|
| 40. |
This is the beginning of Psalm 117. There is a difference of opinion among the authorities if the congregation should repeat the verse Hodu... which begins Psalm 118.
|
| 41. |
The Rambam is stating that these two phrases should be repeated by the congregation after the reader. This custom is followed at present as well, except that it is customary for both the reader and the congregation to repeat each phrase twice.
|
| 42. |
Our translation follows the standard published text of the Mishneh Torah. Based on manuscripts and early printings of the Mishneh Torah, some authorities amend the text so that it reads: "He reads Baruch haba... and they respond beshem A-donai."
At present, it is customary to recite this and the following verses a second time, but not to do so in response to the reader.
|
| 43. |
When the Hallel is recited in the manner described by the Rambam, the entire congregation does not recite the entire Hallel themselves. They nevertheless fulfill their obligation, based on the principle that "one who listens is considered as if he recited [the prayers] himself" (see Hilchot Berachot 1:11).
This principle does not apply, however, when the person reciting the prayer is not obligated to do so. Hence, since all the individuals mentioned by the Rambam (quoting Sukkah 3:10) are not obligated to say Hallel, an adult male cannot fulfill his obligation by listening to their recitation. By repeating the Hallel word for word, he does fulfill his obligation, since in this manner he recites the entire Hallel.
The Mishnah (loc. cit.) states that a person who must have one of the above read for him is worthy of a curse. The intent is that he should learn how to read himself.
|
Parah Adummah - Chapter 8
Halacha 1
When a person was carrying water for the ashes of the red heifer on his shoulders and he stood and delivered a halachic ruling for others, rendered a judgment, a woman performed chalitzah in his presence, a girl performed mi'unin his presence, he gave directions to others, killed a snake or scorpion that did not present a threat to him, or took food from the market to set aside, the water is disqualified. The rationale is that he occupied himself with another activity before placing the ashes on the water.
If, however, he took food in order to eat and ate while he was proceeding on his way or killed a snake or scorpion that was preventing his progress, the water is acceptable, for these activities are necessary to carry the water. This is the general principle: Any activity that is considered as work which was performed before placing the ashes on the water, whether he stood still or not, disqualifies the water. When he performs an activity that is not considered as work, if he does not stand still, the water is acceptable. If he stands still, it is disqualified.
If he was walking while carrying such water and, while he was walking, he made an opening to walk through, the water he is carrying is acceptable, even though he made the opening with the intent of closing it afterwards. If he closes it before placing the ashes on the water, the water is disqualified. Similarly, if he dries fruit to eat, even if later he intends to dry the remainder, the water is acceptable. If he dries the remaining fruit before placing the ashes on the water, it is disqualified.
Halacha 2
The following laws apply if one was eating while carrying such water; he left over some food and cast the leftovers under a fig tree or under a net used to dry figs. If his intent was to prevent the food from perishing, the water is disqualified, because he performed work. If he cast it away because he no longer needs it, the water is acceptable.
When a person drew water to sanctify it and entrusted it to a watchman to oversee, the water is not disqualified if the owner performed work, because he entrusted it to a watchman. If the watchman performs work, he disqualifies it, because the water is in his domain and he takes the place of the owner.
If two people are watching such water and one performs work, the water is acceptable, because the other is watching. If the first returned to his watch and the second stood up and performed work, the water is acceptable. The water's status is maintained unless all of the watchmen perform work at the same time.
Halacha 3
The following rules apply when a person sanctifies water with one hand and performs work with another. If he sanctifies the water for himself, he disqualifies it, because he performed work before casting the ashes on the water. If he sanctified water for his colleague, the water is acceptable, because a person does not disqualify a colleague's water with the performance of such work. For the performance of work does not disqualify the act of sanctification; it disqualifies only the water, and that, only when the one performing the work is a watchman or the owner.
Halacha 4
When a person sanctifies water for himself and a colleague at the same time, his water is disqualified because of the activity he performed in sanctifying his colleague's water. If, however, he sanctifies water belonging to two other people at the same time, they are both acceptable, because the performance of work does not disqualify water belonging to others.
Halacha 5
When a person fills two buckets with his two hands for himself and sanctifies them at once, they are disqualified. If he sanctifies them individually, they are acceptable. If he sanctifies water for himself with both hands at the same time in one sanctification, it is acceptable. If he sanctified two buckets at the same time, they are both disqualified. If, with his two hands, he filled one bucket of water and sanctified another existing bucket for himself, they are both disqualified.
If he filled two buckets with his two hands for another person at the same time, when they are sanctified at once, they are both acceptable. If they were sanctified individually, they are disqualified. If he sanctifies water for another person with both hands at the same time as one sanctification it is acceptable. If, with his two hands, he filled one bucket of water and sanctified another existing bucket for another person, the bucket he filled is disqualified, but the bucket he sanctified is acceptable.
This is the general principle: Whenever work was performed when water was drawn, whether one drew the water for himself or for another person, it is disqualified, Whenever water was drawn according to law and then one performed work before placing the ashes upon it, if the water belonged to him, it is disqualified. If it belongs to someone else, it is acceptable.
In any situation when the water is in his hand and he performs work, whether there is a watchman who does not perform work or whether there is no watchman, the water is disqualified. When the water is not in his hand and he performed work, if there is a watchman, it is not disqualified. If there is no watchman, it is disqualified.
Halacha 6
When a person tells a colleague: "Sanctify water for me and I will sanctify water for you," and they sanctified water for each other, the first is acceptable and the second is disqualified, because he received a wage for sanctifying.
If one tells the other: "Draw water for me and I will draw water for you," and they drew water for each other, the first is unacceptable. The rationale is that since his intent was that his colleague should draw water for him in exchange, it is considered as if he drew water for himself and another person at the same time, in which instance, the water is disqualified. The second bucket is acceptable, because it is permitted to receive payment for drawing water and he did not perform work after drawing the water, nor did have an intent regarding another drawing of water.
Halacha 7
When a person tells a friend: "Sanctify water for me and I will draw water for you," they are both acceptable. The rationale is that work does not disqualify sanctification and it permitted to receive a wage for drawing water.
If one tells the other: "Draw water for me and I will sanctify water for you," they are both disqualified. The water drawn originally is disqualified, because it is considered as if he drew water and sanctified it at the same time and thus caused the water he drew to be disqualified because of the performance of work. And the water sanctified afterwards is disqualified, because it is as if he sanctified water for a wage, because it is as if he was repaying a debt for which he was liable.
Halacha 8
When a person goes to sanctify water for the ashes of the red heifer, he may take the key to the closet where the ashes are kept and open it to take out the ashes. If it is necessary to dig out the ashes, he may take a hatchet. He may take a ladder and carry it from place to place to bring the ashes. In all these circumstances, the water and the ashes remain acceptable. If after taking the ashes for the sanctification, he covered the container in which the ashes were held, locked the door of the closet, or stood the container where the ashes were held upright on the ground before casting the ashes on the water, the water is disqualified, but the ashes are acceptable to sanctify other water.
If, by contrast, he stood the container in which the ashes were held upright in his hand so that the remaining ashes would not be scattered, it is acceptable, because it is impossible to do otherwise. If he places it down on the ground, the water is disqualified and if he covers it, the water is disqualified.
If he took ashes and saw that the amount was excessive and returned some, it is acceptable. If he cast the ashes on the water and then returned some, the water is acceptable. If he cast the ashes on the water and saw that the amount was excessive and took some to sanctify other water, it is acceptable.
If he trimmed an olive leaf to use to cast the ashes, the ruling depends on his intent. If his intent was so that the leaf would not hold much ashes, the water is disqualified. If his intent was to direct the flow of the ashes so that they would enter the container holding the water, the water is acceptable.
Parah Adummah - Chapter 9
Halacha 1
How is the water sanctified with the ashes of the red heifer? One should place the water that was drawn for this purpose in a container and then place ashes on the water so that they will be seen on the surface of the water. This is sufficient even though it is a large barrel filled with water. He should then mix the entire contents. If he placed the ashes in the container first and then placed the water upon them, it is disqualified.
What then is meant by the Torah's statement Numbers 19:17: "And he shall place living water upon it"? That the ash should be mixed with the water.
Halacha 2
A person sanctifying must focus his concentration. He must cast the ashes on the water by hand. These concepts are implied by the phrase ibid.: "And he shall take for the impure person...." The latter words indicate that he must have a specific intent while sanctifying, drawing, and sprinkling.
Thus if the ashes of the red heifer fell from the container holding them into the water, he took the ashes with his hand, but then a friend or the wind thrust him and the ashes fell from his hand onto the water, or the ashes fell from his hand onto the side of the container or onto his hand and then onto the water, the water is disqualified,
Halacha 3
If one sanctified an amount of water insufficient for sprinkling in one container and sanctified another amount of water insufficient for sprinkling in another container, they are not sanctified. If the ashes were floating on the surface of the water and one gathered some from above and sanctified other water with it, it is sanctified. By contrast, any ashes that touched the water may not be used to sanctify water again even if they were dried. Indeed, even if ashes were blown onto water by the wind they may not be dried and used to sanctify other water.
Halacha 4
The following rules apply when there was a small container placed inside a large container, they were both filled with water drawn for the ashes of the red heifer, and their waters were intermingled. When one placed ashes on the water in the large container, all of the water in the small container became sanctified even though its opening is very narrow and no ashes entered there. The rationale is that the waters were intermingled.
Halacha 5
When there was a sponge in the water at the time one placed the ashes upon it, the water in the sponge is disqualified because it is not in a container.
What should the person do to remove the water? He should pour off all the water until he reaches the sponge, but should not touch the sponge. If he touches the sponge, no matter how much water is above it, all of the water is disqualified, because the water in the sponge is released and mixes with the acceptable water.
If a sponge falls into sanctified water, one should take it and squeeze it outside the container and the water in the container remains acceptable.
Halacha 6
When there are two adjacent troughs in one stone and ashes were placed into one of them, the water in the other is not sanctified. When there was a hole the size of a mouthpiece of a leather drinking pouch connecting the two or there was a layer of water even as thin as a garlic peel connecting them from above, if one placed the ashes into one, the water in the second is sanctified.
Halacha 7
When two stones are placed together to form a trough, two kneading troughs are placed together, or a stone trough was divided and then the two portions held together, were the ashes of the red heifer to be placed in one, the water between them is not sanctified. If the two entities were connected with lime or with plaster and they could be carried as one, the water between them is sanctified.
Halacha 8
When even the smallest amount of other water - even water that was drawn for the sake of the ashes of the red heifer - becomes mixed with sanctified water, it is disqualified. Similarly, if dew descends into such water, it is disqualified. If other liquids or fruit juices fall into it, the entire quantity should be poured out. The container must be dried; only afterwards can other sanctified water be placed in it.
If ink, black earth, or dark earth, or any entity that leaves a mark falls into such water, it must be poured out, but there is no need to dry the container. The rationale is that if any portion of the entity that leaves a mark will remain, it will be apparent.
Halacha 9
When a person immerses a container for water for the ashes of the red heifer in water that is not fit to be sanctified, he must dry it before he sanctifies other water in it. If he immersed it in water that is fit to be sanctified, he does not have to dry out the container. If, however, he immersed it with the intent of using it to hold sanctified water, he must dry it in any case.
Halacha 10
When a gourd was immersed in water that was fit to be sanctified, one may sanctify water in it. But one may not collect water that has already been sanctified with the ashes in it. The rationale is that the water in which it was immersed becomes absorbed in its substance; afterwards, it emerges, becomes mixed with the sanctified water, and disqualifies it.
If it became impure, even if it was immersed, we do not sanctify water in it. The rationale is that impure water is absorbed in its substance. It will flow out and become mixed with the water that is being sanctified in it.
Halacha 11
When crawling animals or teeming animals fell into water that was sanctified and broke open or caused its color to change, the water is disqualified. This applies even if they were very dry like an ant, moth, or lice that is found in grain. If he placed beetles in such water, it is disqualified even if they did not break open or cause the color of the water to change. The rationale is that they are like tubes and the water enters their body and departs from it, mixed with their body fluids.
Halacha 12
When a domesticated or wild animal drinks from sanctified water, he disqualifies it. Similarly, all birds disqualify it with the exception of a dove, because it sucks water and saliva does not flow from its mouth and become mixed in the water. Similarly, if any of the crawling animals drink from sanctified water, they do not disqualify it with the exception of the mole. It licks the water with its tongue and thus moisture will be released from its mouth into the water.
Halacha 13
When the appearance of water sanctified with the ashes of the red heifer changes without any external cause, it is acceptable. If it changes color because of smoke, it is disqualified. If it froze and then melted, it is acceptable, even if it melted in the sun. If, however, it was melted by fire, it is disqualified.
Halacha 14
When the appearance of the ashes of the red heifer changed without any external cause or because of smoke, they are acceptable. If their appearance changed because of dust, because lime or gypsum fell into them, or because even the slightest amount of oven ash fell into them, they are disqualified.
Halacha 15
When a person thinks about drinking water sanctified with the ashes of the red heifer, he does not disqualify it until he actually drinks from it. If he poured from the container directly to his throat without his lips touching the water in the container, he does not disqualify it.
Halacha 16
When a container in which the water for the ashes of the red heifer had been placed was left open and then one discovered it closed, the water is disqualified. We suspect that maybe a person who had not purified himself for dealing with the water for the ashes of the red heifer touched it, for it is certain that a person covered it.
The following rules apply if one left it covered and found it open. If a mole could have drunk from it or dew could have descended upon it at night, it is disqualified. If not, it is acceptable. The rationale is that two undeterminable factors are involved. It is unknown whether it was uncovered by a person or a domesticated animal, wild animal, or crawling animal. And if you would say that it was uncovered by a person, it is unknown whether he was pure with regard to the water of the ashes of the red heifer.
Halacha 17
When a person transfers sanctified water or water that was drawn to be sanctified to an impure person to watch, the water is disqualified.
Halacha 18
When two people are watching water and one becomes impure, the water is still acceptable, because it is in the domain of the other watchman. If the first purified himself and the other watchman became impure, it is acceptable because the water is in the domain of the first.
Parah Adummah - Chapter 10
Halacha 1
When a person draws water to be sanctified, he does not have to be the person who sanctified and sprinkles the water on an impure person. Instead, another person may sanctify it and another may sprinkle it. Similarly, a person may draw water with one container and pour it from container to container. And he may sanctify it in a different container, pour the sanctified water from one container to another, and sprinkle it from a different container.
Halacha 2
A person may draw water for the ashes of the red heifer and keep it in his possession without sanctifying it for as long as he desires. There is no difficulty in this. He may transport it from place to place and from city to city and then place ashes upon it and sanctify it whenever he desires.
Similarly, a person may keep sanctified water in his possession for many days or years and sprinkle from it on any day that he needs to until it is used up. He may transport it from place to place and from city to city. Similarly, a person may keep the ashes of the red heifer in his possession and transport it from place to place and from city to city. Once a container in which the ashes of the red heifer were held was transported in a ship on the Jordan River and an olive-sized portion of a corpse was discovered on the bottom of the ship, making the water impure. At that time, the High Court decreed that the water for the ashes of the red heifer and the ashes themselves should not be transported on a river, nor on a ship. Similarly, one should not float them on water, nor should a person stand on one side of a river and throw them to the other. A person may, however, pass through water until it reaches his neck while holding the ashes of the red heifer or sanctified water.
Similarly, a person and empty containers that were purified for the ashes of the red heifer and water that was drawn for the sake of the ashes of the red heifer that was not sanctified may be transported on a river and on a ship.
Halacha 3
Sanctified water may be transported on the Mediterranean Sea and it may be floated on such water. The decree encompassed only sanctified water and ashes on a river.
Halacha 4
When a person is transporting water to be sanctified - and, needless to say, water that has been sanctified - he should not sling the container over his back, but instead, should carry it in front of him, as implied by Numbers 19:9: "as safekeeping, as water for sprinkling." One can infer when it is watched, it may be used as water for sprinkling. If not, it is disqualified. If one filled two jugs, he should carry one in front of him and one behind him, because it is impossible to do otherwise.
Halacha 5
When water for the ashes of the red heifer was weighed on a scale, it is disqualified if one diverted his attention from it. If not, it is acceptable. If, however, one weighed other entities with water for the ashes of the red heifer, it is disqualified. The rationale is that since one used it as a weight, it is not considered as having been "watched."
All of the pure individuals who draw water, sanctify it, and sprinkle it and, similarly, all of the utensils used for drawing water, sanctifying it, and sprinkling it are acceptable if they were immersed on that day even though night has not fallen upon them. For all of the activities involving the red heifer, drawing the water, and sprinkling it are acceptable when performed by individuals who had immersed that day, as we explained.
Because of the Sadducees, all of the utensils that can be purified are made impure, immersed, and then used for the water for the ashes of the red heifer.
Halacha 6
Everyone is acceptable to sprinkle the water with the ashes of the red heifer with the exception of a woman, a tumtum, an androgynus, a deafmute, an intellectually and/or emotionally compromised person, and a minor who is not intellectually mature. Similarly,] an uncircumcised person is acceptable, for an uncircumcised person is not impure.
When an intellectually mature minor sprinkles such water and a woman helps him, she holds the water in her hand, his sprinkling is acceptable provided she does not hold his hand while he is sprinkling. If she held his hand while he is sprinkling, the sprinkling is unacceptable.
Halacha 7
The person sprinkling the water must have the intent to sprinkle on the impure person to purify him. If he sprinkled without such an intent, the sprinkling is invalid. The person upon whom the water is sprinkled, by contrast, does not need to have any intent. Instead, water may be sprinkled on a person with his knowledge or without his knowledge.
When a person has the intent to sprinkle such water in front of himself and he sprinkles behind himself, or he had the intent of sprinkling water behind himself and he sprinkled in front of himself, his sprinkling is invalid. If he had the intent to sprinkle such water in front of himself and he sprinkled in front, but to the sides, his sprinkling is acceptable.
Halacha 8
The person sprinkling the water need not dip the hyssop in the water for every sprinkling. Instead, he may dip the hyssop and sprinkle once and again until the water was completed. He may sprinkle on many people or many utensils - even 100 - at a time. Anyone who was touched by even the slightest amount of the water is pure, provided the one sprinkling had the intent of sprinkling on him.
If one dipped the hyssop with the intent of sprinkling on an entity that is susceptible to ritual impurity or on a person and, instead, sprinkled the water on an entity that was not susceptible to ritually impurity or on an animal, he need not dip the hyssop again if water remained on it. Instead, he may sprinkle the remainder on an impure person or utensil. The rationale is that, at the outset, he dipped it in the water in an acceptable manner. If, by contrast, he dipped the hyssop in the water in order to sprinkle it on an entity that is not susceptible to ritual impurity or on an animal, and sprinkled it on an impure man or utensil, the sprinkling is invalid until he dips the hyssop in the water a second time, while having the intent to sprinkle on a person or on an entity that is susceptible to ritual impurity.
Halacha 9
If he dipped the hyssop in the water with the intent of sprinkling on an entity that is not susceptible to ritual impurity, the water that drips from the hyssop are still acceptable. Therefore if it drips into a container and one dips the hyssop in it with the intent of sprinkling it on an entity that is susceptible to ritual impurity, the sprinkling is acceptable.
Halacha 10
Although the volume of the water of the ashes of the red heifer has been reduced, one may dip even the tips of the hyssop stalks and sprinkle, provided one does not use it like a sponge. When a flask has a thin opening, he may dip and withdraw the hyssop in the ordinary manner and then sprinkle with it. He need not be careful that it does not touch the sides of the container a second time.
• Tuesday, Tammuz 20, 5775 · 07 July 2015
"Today's Day"
Friday Tamuz 20 5703
Torah lessons: Chumash: Pinchas, Shishi with Rashi.
Tehillim: 97-103.
Tanya: Precisely so (p. 357) ...or articulation. (p. 357).
There are three forms of hitbon'nut (contemplation, meditation):
(a.) Study-meditation: After mastering the concept thoroughly, one meditates on its profundity, until the intellectual element shines forth for him.
(b.) Meditation before davening: This is directed toward sensing the vitality of the concept learned, in contrast to sensing the intellectual element emphasized in study-meditation.
(c.) Meditation in davening: To sense the "G-dly element" in the concept learned.
These three are rungs on the ladder of sensitivity. It is only by G-d's kindness towards us that we may occasionally sense G-dhood spontaneously, without anyavoda at all. This comes about by virtue of the quality of Ultimate Essential G-dhood1 within the soul. For avoda by one's own efforts, however, these three forms of meditation are essential.
FOOTNOTES
1. Atzmut.
Daily Thought:
Who Is Doing What?
G‑d wanted a being—a somebody—not a puppet. A creature that would decide, “This is how it should be done, using such-and-such and in such a way with such a feeling—this is what my Creator wants from me.”
The score is handed to us, but the music comes from our own souls.
____________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment